A thorough debunking of Project 2025 and dystopian Heritage Foundation objectives

I downloaded the Project 2025 “book” from The Heritage Foundation website yesterday. Soon, I’ll dig into the contents and its proposals, but the first fascinating dissection examines the tone and nature of its introduction. This document is the product of frightened white men screaming into the void of their paranoia, defined as “a mental state where a person has an irrational fear of others and a persistent belief that they are being harmed or deceived.” The definition perfectly describes The Heritage Foundation and its pet Project 2025. The language is rife with raw hyperbole, blatant hypocrisy, and outright denial of the real cause of America’s disease of conflicted ideology, which is longstanding Republican incompetence in governance and blaming the Left for the problems it engenders.

The first paragraphs reap what it intends to sow, demonstrating the paranoia behind the document’s intention:

The Left has spent millions fearmongering about Project 2025, because they’re terrified of losing their power. And they should be. Project 2025 offers a menu of solutions to the border crisis, inflation, a stagnant economy, and rampant crime. It shows how we can take on China, fix our schools, and support families. But most importantly, it dismantles the unaccountable Deep State, taking power away from Leftist elites and giving it back to the American people.

The opening tactic, as you see here, is to accuse the other side of your own level of paranoia. This is the tone of the entire Project 2025 document. I’ve gone through the opening sections to examine how this fear-driven ideology stakes its ground and employs rabid hyperbole to incite self-righteous rage among its intended audience. They quickly move to accusations against the “cultural elite” they so despise.

“The bad news today is that our political establishment and cultural elite have once again driven America toward decline. The good news is that we know the way out even though the challenges today are not what they were in the 1970s. Conservatives should be confident that we can rescue our kids, reclaim our culture, revive our economy, and defeat the anti-American Left—at home and abroad. We did it before and will do it again.”

Notice the tactic of retreating to the Reagan Era to claim success in the so-called “Culture Wars.” Conservatives love to believe that Ronald Reagan restored conservatism to its rightful place to “unite the nation,” but that’s the first lie, because it ignores the fact that Reagan historically leveraged racial fears using terms such as “welfare queens” to enrage and divide Americans along bigoted lines. This salvo echoes to this day in Trumpism’s dog-whistle racism and fear of intellectual Black people while dismissing the many sins of men like Clarence Thomas whose long record of questionable behavior and ethical breaches earn no rebukes from hypocritical conservatives eager to claim Black men among their ranks. The Republican Party and its newest manifesto eagerly seek to leverage racism, bigotry, misogyny and Christian patriarchal rule over society as the foundation of what they want to call “democracy,” if that is a concern at all.

The passage above refers to revitalization of the economy, which Democrats under Clinton, Obama, and President Joe Biden all accomplished in the wake of Republican malfeasance and economic crashes wrought by massive tax breaks for the wealthy, refusal to respect or uphold financial regulations, and letting predatory lenders run amok with interest rates on credit cards to trading toxic mortgages. The cause of the 2008 recession was manifold, with both parties bearing aspects of blame, but the list of sins weighs heavier on the GOP side, because while selling subprime mortgages to consumers was a bad idea, like most sins, it was hiding the problem that made it far worse. The go-go, white-hot belief in eternal growth during the Bush era fueled conservative hubris that was too good to be true:

  • Subprime mortgage crisis: During the housing boom, lenders expanded their definition of creditworthiness and began offering mortgages to borrowers with poor credit histories. These high-risk loans, known as subprime mortgages, were packaged and sold to investors. 
  • Deregulation: The financial industry was deregulated, allowing for speculation on derivatives backed by mortgages. 
  • Excessive risk-taking: Banks created too much money too quickly and used it to speculate on financial markets and push up house prices. 
  • Increased borrowing: Banks and investors borrowed more money. 
  • Regulation and policy errors: There were errors in regulations and policies. 

Before all that happened, we should not forget that it was the Savings & Loan crisis, as it was essentially Republican permission that first exposed the dangers of banking deregulations foisted on society by Reaganism. The Corporate Finance Institute summarizes it this way: “In conclusion, the banking and S&L crisis of the 1980s and early 1990s was caused by a combination of factors, including deregulation, interest rate risk, a volatile real estate market, risky loans, fraud, and mismanagement.”

This quick analysis of conservative deregulation efforts demonstrates how The Heritage Foundation ignores many things Reagan did wrong while claiming him as a hero for all time. Reagan Worship is at the heart of 2025ism, dependent on the emphatic denial that the despotic Grandpa people branded The Great Communicator led one of the most corrupt administrations in United States history. So the premise that going back to Reaganism would Make America Great Again is the principle falsehood behind conservatism’s sentimental views toward an eventually daft and dementia-ridden corrupt President. They’re repeating the same sin by re-elected a clearly compromised mental mess in Donald Trump after maligning Joe Biden as too old to run again. And worse, when Democrats took charge and counseled Biden to step down, the man did so in respect to his nation’s best interests. None of this can be said for Trump, whose mental deterioration is both evident and dangerous, but whose need to avoid convictions on multiple legal fronts forces him to run for his life. That’s the only reason, along with more opportunities to grift and steal from America’s wealth through personal and political channels, Trump had to again. Trump also wants to remake the world in his image. That’s how a toxic narcissist works.

And yet, the Republican Party loves to reminisce about Reagan’s own version of nation-forming, as “an unyielding Reagan told National Security Adviser Robert McFarlane, “I want you to do whatever you have to do to help these people keep body and soul together” about the Contras down south. *PBS report

Those are not the words of a man who loves freedom. They are the words of a man who fears failure because he thinks he’s the most powerful man in the world and can’t admit that people won’t do what he says. Later, in a comic parlay of desperation and determination, Reagan shipped 1500 arms to Iran for a seven-man hostage release after claiming he’d freed all those other folks as his term began. That tells us that Reagan, like today’s Heritage Foundation, sought to undermine honest democratic processes to conduct shadow government activities, all while blaming the “Deep State” for supposedly secret ventures.

If “freedom is a fragile thing,” then so is democracy when it is gutted by the willful actions of a unitary executive and crooked accomplices. Nixon led the way on that, Reagan echoed it, and eventually it was the irascibly domineering VP Dick Cheney who gave voice to it. But all along, it was Republican administrations wishing their guy was king. At the same time, it was those “kings” who led the way in terms of criminal indictments and convictions compared to Democrat presidencies.

Reagan presided over the HUD scandal under James Watt and the Iran-Contra scandal, busting unions and gutting the middle class were just some of the ways Reagan used the government he claimed to despise to dismantle financial protections for Americans and mess around on the world stage. It is also speculated that Reagan played loose with constitutional laws to free the hostages held by Iran, but solid proof never emerged. But do we doubt that there were such efforts given the later actions by Oliver North to commit acts of subterfuge?

That sort of willful denial of past transgressions, extending to the likes of Newt Gingrich and his dismissive views on marriage, leaves The Heritage Foundation able to claim all kinds of high-minded family values and patriotism without a shred of guilt over the bogus values apologetics for Reagan, the Bushes, and now Donald Trump, a serial adulterer and constitutional shredder par excellence.

Republicans went full fever dream over Bill Clinton’s Oval Office blowjobs and the Blue Dress, but so-called righteous Republican never questioned Nancy’s astrological addictions in defiance of Christian despise for such things, much less her dirty little mouth. The euphemistically named “Christian Right” also “looked the other way” when it came to Nancy Reagan’s hooky-spooky astrological beliefs and Hollywood habits.

Nor did anyone follow up on Nancy Reagan’s odd reputation as shared by political commentator Hunter S. Thompson, who said, “I had a soft spot in my heart for Ronald Reagan, if only because he was a sportswriter in his youth, and also because his wife gave the best head in Hollywood.”

She put her mouth to other clandestine uses with her seemingly innocent anti-drug “Just Say No” campaign preaching substance abstinence to white suburban kids. But the people victimized by that campaign were instead thousands of Black Americans rounded up and jailed on small drug charges. But Republicans used that legacy as an accusatory tool of Jim Crow imposition on Black Men.The for-profit jail industry that emerged to reap dough from that travesty turned out to be a favorite among conservatives eager to punish Black Americans for standing up to White Authority of any kind. Private prisons also replaced slavery as tools for cheap labor.

It all began even earlier, under Nixon. As documented in the OpenSecrets website: “Since President Richard Nixon declared the national “War on Drugs” in the 1970s, the American prison population has skyrocketed; the same is true of the numbers of people locked up in private prisons, especially since the 1990s. Of the 2016 contributions that went to candidates or parties, 85 percent went to Republicans. That’s higher than in most previous cycles, but consistent with the conservative leanings of this industry. Since 1990, private prisons have given 73 percent of their total party-and-candidate contributions to Republicans.” The criminal persecution and prejudice against of Black men and women, on top of economic losses wrought by the disadvantage of slavery, is responsible for that culture’s familial difficulties, pursuant crime and gang activity, and the still-relentless blaming of “minorities” and immigrants for America’s problems. Many Black Americans lead the nation in every human endeavor, which is proof that the prejudice aimed against them in this nation is the travesty for which the country needs to account. That’s why the claims of The Heritage Foundation drip with bloody irony when making statements such as these in Project 2025:

“Freedom is a fragile thing and it’s never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by way of inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation[.]1 “

The Heritage Foundation loves to ignore the Republican affiliation with its dirty bedfellows, such as those openly waving flags at the insurrection. These include Confederacy holdouts, neo-Nazis, the KKK, anti-Semitic groups and influencers, and backwoods militias eager to overthrow the government using AR-15s atop their bulging waistbands. The GOP loves such complicity in its stalwarts and doesn’t seem to care if they stand for everything America isn’t supposed to be.

P25 loves to ring the bell of “family values” and freedom based ostensibly on the Constitution as one bookend and Christian values on the other. But the volumes between constitute a condensed library of bigotry, discrimination, religious persecution, and self-proclaimed victimhood. There’s also irony amid transitional statements like this one:

“Restore the family as the centerpiece of American life and protect our children.”

Supposedly, conservatives don’t like the government interfering in the lives of people. That’s the opposite of conservatism. It’s unclear what or how The Heritage Foundation plans to do to impose “the family as the centerpiece of American life,” but if you look at the weird calls for corporal punishment tin schools, one wonders if Project 2025 isn’t a massive excuse for profligate child abuse. Yahoo News reports, “Oklahoma State Rep. Jim Olsen says corporal punishment in schools has been “successful” for centuries and should remain legal, even for students with disabilities.”

Pro-Life? More like Pro-Sperm.

Any organization refusing to hold men accountable for abortions caused my male imposition of sperm on women is hypocritical.

That’s right, every single abortion in America is caused by a man’s sperm.

But the so-called “Pro-Life” movement never mentions that fact. Instead, they persist in accusing women of being irresponsible by holding to what are now called “reproductive rights.” To enforce this misogynistic worldview, the Heritage Foundation identified potential Supreme Court justices willing to overturn the established law of Roe vs. Wade and throw the abortion rights issue back to the jurisdiction of states. Those justices acted deceitfully in their testimony, insinuating they respected established law on abortion, but in effect, they lied. Now the tragedies of undercutting women’s healthcare rights results in death for women facing medical emergencies.

The conservative faction of America even preaches that pregnancies wrought by rape should be “brought to term.” By those measures, women are nothing but vessels for male sperm according to The Heritage Foundation.

There is nothing “pro-family” about blaming women for problems caused by men or supported by busybody moralizing Christian women behaving like Conservative Mean Girls looking to control other women’s lives. They may “pray” to end abortion, and that’s fine. But then they vote for men willing to stick their dicks into women’s lives without remorse.

The hypocrisy of the Pro-Life defies its supposed roots in Christian values. The Bible shows Jesus dismissing those accusing a woman of adultery by stating, “Let he that is without sin cast the first stone.” With that statement, Jesus indicts not just the men seeking to kill the woman according to their laws (an idea recently raised in some US) but also indicts the authoritarian state from which the stoning tradition emanated. In other words, Jesus indicted the men who brought the women before him, not the woman accused by them.

This proves that if Jesus were alive today, he would say, “If you must depend upon the law to bring about the kingdom of God, you have already failed.”

So yes, on every issue, The Heritage Foundation fails America with its dystopian Project 2025.

(dys·to·pi·an/disˈtōpēən/ “relating to or denoting an imagined state or society where there is great suffering or injustice.) version of authoritarian rule over society.

The HF P 25 is not only dystopian, it is fascist at its core. Consider the definition fascism as it relates to what you’ve already read and learned here, and what is about to come:

Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy (Christianity), subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race (White people) and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

That last note about fascism on the Right, strong regimentation of society and the economy is ardently resisted by Republican fascists claiming instead that they advocate “free market economics.”

But since Reagan the forcible redistribution of wealth from the middle class to America’s wealthiest citizens is not a product of the “free market” at all. Reagan’s specious version of “trickle-down economics” is an economic experiment rewarding corporatism and a plutocracy aided by massive tax breaks for the uber-wealthy while workers’ wages remain flat or depressed. Efforts to raise minimum wages are called “socialism” by economic cynics, a gaslighting of the lower and middle class to subjugate their interests.

A small sector of the US population now possesses more wealth than the other 96% combined. Statistics aren’t the point. The real matter is how factions of society impacted by these policies now believe that the people who caused them are the cure to their problems! The wealthy plutocrat named Donald Trump makes all sorts of promises to Make America Great Again while bloating the national debt by 25%, promising tax cuts for the middle class that expired, and giving billions over to the rich who fund his feckless whims of tariffs, false accounting and outright lies. He’s promised to exclude corporations from environmental legislation who ante up billions to avoid being accountable. That’s environmental injustice bought and sold. The people typically victimized by environmental pollution are the poor, especially minorities.

The Heritage Foundation reflects this vow to sell off American virtues to the highest bidder by dismantling governmental protections and blaming Americans for their own problems:

“Dismantle the administrative state and return self-governance to the American people.”

There’s another counter to this P25 argument. The “administrative state” under Trump’s rule led to an attempt to overthrow the government after he lost the 2020 election. His lies about election fraud, the plot to assemble fake electors and his attempted coup through the January 6th insurrection all prove that his vision of the “administrative state” is a fascist form of government where he rules like a king without question of his authority. The Heritage Foundation knows this, but refuses to admit it. In fact, it is their entire goal to use Trump as a leveraging device, wait for him to croak from his bad habits, and put in place a theocratic state ruling over the United States of American with administrative impact forcing itself into every aspect of our lives.

But oh, yeah, there’s also the “border crisis.” Let’s talk about that.  

“Defend our nation’s sovereignty, borders, and bounty against global threats.”

Hey guys, you know who welcomed millions of immigrant into America over the last fifty years? That’s right: it was companies seeking cheap labor while privatizing the profits and socializing the losses. And the accounting of supposed “costs” to Americans in terms of taxes covering immigrant needs seem to ignore the tax contributions of those targeted by such accusations.

And yes, our schools and public facilities need support to deal with language-challenged immigrant children and adults. But that support should come from the companies employing cheaper immigrant labor, because they are privatizing the profits and exporting the costs to everyday Americans. That’s true in Big Ag. That’s true in the restaurant industry, hospitality, you name it. That’s not how the “free market” is supposed to work. If you use the product, which is immigrants, you should pay the bills for those benefits. What we’re actually seeing is socialized corporatism. The Nanny State of corporate welfare is the real problem, not benefits earned and secured by Americans through Social Security, Medicare, or Veteran’s Affairs.

But all P25 wants to talk about is God, because, you know, that sounds righteous and true.

“Secure our God-given individual rights to live freely—what our Constitution calls “the Blessings of Liberty.”

Well, now we see how hypocritical the Heritage Foundation is. They opposite aims than to secure the “Blessings of Liberty.” People already suffer the effects of Right-Wing identity politics suppressing women’s rights, Black and civil equity, human diversity, or any kind of inclusion. The Heritage Foundation advocates fascism, not freedom, and is in truth a godless organization in all its principle claims. It spits on Jesus by seeking to create a society divided along ideological terms with specific terms of discrimination.

Anyone familiar with the parable of the Good Samaritan knows better. It was self-righteous religious zealots passing by the man left for dead in the ditch because he was considered “unclean” according to religious and cultural laws imposed by legalistic authorities. Instead, the Good Samaritan, a man from a people despised by the community, who saved the man from suffering, paid for his care (that’s socialism) and even funded his needs until he was nursed back to health. If left to the devices of The Heritage Foundation, that man rots in the ditch because he’s unworthy of protection under “God’s Laws” according to biblically literal interpretations of anachronistic scriptures. The Good Samaritan, while well-off, constituted a “radical, bleeding-heart do-gooder” of the type that Jesus proclaimed as worthy of God’s grace.

All of this proves that Project 2025 is a gaslighting pack of self-righteous lies.

“In 1979, the threats we faced were the Soviet Union, the socialism of 1970s liberals, and the predatory deviancy of cultural elites. Reagan defeated these beasts by ignoring their tentacles and striking instead at their hearts.”

No, Reagan did not “defeat these beasts.” Conservatism emphatically lost the battle to control the lives of people based on identity politics, but now they’re engaging in warlike attempts at a fascist takeover of American laws.

For sure, the Moral Majority movement took hold in the United States. It’s denial of reality became the foundation of right-wing politics. Religious conservatism embraced that fight by opposing the teaching of evolution and scientific truth in public schools, seeking to replace it with the “science of denial” based on creationism and euphemistic Intelligent Design. This inane ideology of denial infects nearly 40% of the American population. That is the “majority” that supports the likes of a devilish liar like Trump while claiming he’s a “man of God” made in the image of King David while insisting, quite devilishly in its own right, that “God works with flawed people.”

Well, guess what? John the Baptist would argue with that. The “man of the wilderness” defined the religious and political authorities of his day in advance of Jesus’ arrival on the scene. John called the religious authorities a “brood of vipers” in an echo of the legalistic Serpent who deceived Adam and Eve in that holy parable of humanity’s creation. The Baptist also tossed out religious rituals and the “pay for play” model of Prosperity Gospel in force at the Temple, where money-changers turned God’s house into a commercial enterprise. John later paid the price for his honesty when King Herod, the prophetically perfect model for Donald Trump in his melding of politics and religion, had John’s head chopped off on a promise to his daughter that if she danced lasciviously for his audience the King would grant her any favor she asked. Her corrupt mother asked for the head of John the Baptist because “he publicly denounced her marriage to Herod Antipas, criticizing it as unlawful since she was previously married to Herod’s brother Philip, which went against Jewish law; this public rebuke deeply offended Herodias and fueled her desire for revenge against John.”

Oh, my Lord! What does that say about the serial adulterer and thrice-married and divorced Donald Trump? It does not sound like John the Baptist, the precessor to Jesus in Judeo-Christian heritage, would approve of the sexually abusive narcissist whose relationship with Jeffrey Epstein revealed that he “likes them young?”

Well, even so. The Baptist’s disapproval still does not make it an “American Value” or representative of the liberties promised in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The Separation Clause in the 1st Amendment proves that there shall be no state religion. But if the Project 2025 initiative DOES succeed, shouldn’t it impose John the Baptists indictment on the likes of Donald Trump? Okay! Bring it on! Let’s see it!

What about Russia and Putin?

As for threats from the Soviet Union being “defeated” by Reagan, America now lives under the thumb of Vladimir Putin’s dictates through Trump, including collusion that he denies, and documented election interference by the Russian state through American social media and even its conservative talking heads on Fox, Newsmax and many other outlets trumping talking points straight from the Pipeline of Putin. Trump is also a kompromat to Russian interests and investment in his businesses. And whether Trump likes to admit it or not, the information revealed about him in the dossier a few years back rings all too true given his corrupt and perverted behavior confessed in public and alluded in his Jeffrey Epstein affiliations.

But look at how P25 tries to avoid their support of a corrupt felon and adjudicated rapist.

“In many ways, the entire point of centralizing political power is to subvert the family. Its purpose is to replace people’s natural loves and loyalties with unnatural ones. You see this in the popular left-wing aphorism, “Government is simply the name we give to the things we choose to do together.” But in real life, most of the things people “do together” have nothing to do with government.”

Well, we know that Reagan once stated, “Government is not the solution to our problems, government is the problem.” And yet P25 plans to use the government to impose its well over all Americans. Again, the hypocrisy and gaslighting the fear and bigotry, the outright hate and delusion are all wrapped together in the paranoid fascism and accusations of the Right that the Left, whose main mission is equal rights, is somehow the cause of America’s problems.

Just look at the fascist tone of this insane statement:

“Furthermore, the next conservative President must understand that using government alone to respond to symptoms of the family crisis is a dead end. Federal power must instead be wielded to reverse the crisis and rescue America’s kids from familial breakdown. The Conservative Promise includes dozens of specific policies to accomplish this existential task.”

See how that works? When liberalism advocates for personal freedoms, it’s evil. But when conservatism threatens fascist impositions, it is liberty at work. These people are nuts. They are consumed with a paranoia so deep it infests their minds like brain worms. Perhaps that’s why RFK, Jr. is so popular a choice for an administrative post.

Here’s more P25 paranoia:

“Today the Left is threatening the tax-exempt status of churches and charities that reject woke progressivism. They will soon turn to Christian schools and clubs with the same totalitarian intent.”

This might be justified given the many churches seem to be little more than political delivery points for fascist right-wing agendas. The entire premise upon which tax-exempt status is granted is avoiding political purposes through religion. That’s based on the First Amendment Separation Clause. So, get a clue, Heritage Foundation. The only reason churches would lose tax-exempt status is by doing your bidding. You’re the cause, not the solution to religious loss of liberty.

But Oh My God, the next bit of language sounds like Civil War.

“The next conservative President must make the institutions of American civil society hard targets for woke culture warriors.”

That’s a violent threat. That’s viciousness as policy. That’s un-American, and yet Trump embraces it by stating he plans to persecute “the enemy within.” The sociopathic tone of the hate directed toward “woke culture warriors” shows zero empathy for people long victimized by the longstanding cultural contract of bigotry imposed according to by race, sexual orientation, gender, and religion. Fascism loves to ignore its hateful side and history to claim perpetual authority.

“This starts with deleting the terms sexual orientation and gender identity (“SOGI”), diversity, equity, and inclusion.”

Well, look at that. A great example of censorship to impose bigotry and thought control. That’s George Orwell’s 1984 in action. Then look at the terrified word salad that comes along next. Paranoid much?

(“DEI”), gender, gender equality, gender equity, gender awareness, gender-sensi- tive, abortion, reproductive health, reproductive rights, and any other term used to deprive Americans of their First Amendment rights out of every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.”

That’s censorship, people. The Heritage Foundation wants to “cancel culture” everything it fears. What goddamned hypocrites.

Oh, and naked pictures? Well, that has to go too.

“Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women.”

Art by Christopher Cudworth titled, “Commisseration” ®2022

We’ve been through many trials to determine the difference between art and pornography. Who else recalls the actions of the John Ashcroft covering up the metal breasts of nude statues in Washington?

We’ve learned that such prudes often have plenty to hide themselves.

As for child sexual abuse. Do you know who conducts some of the worst child predation and pedophilia in America? It’s religious institutions ranging from the Catholic Church to Protestant and Evangelical Youth Pastors. Even the Boy Scouts of America, a highly conservative organization, paid out billions to victims of youth sexual abuse for conduct documented for decades. Even former Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert got caught hiding illicit behavior and child abuse from his wrestling coach days. The bigger they are the harder that fall.

All forms of child sexual abuse are awful, but The Heritage Foundation ignores the facts of its real sources to aim hatred at others, especially targets like Drag Queens, while ignoring its closest friends sticking their hands down the pants of boys and girls alike.

What P25 really fears is how many of its own folks can’t resist some good fapping. Even Speaker Mike Johnson enlisted his son as an anti-porn agent, which suggests it was a big problem for both of them. That’s pretty typical out there in the world of suppressed sexual urges. Many of the world’s worst offenders become anti-this-or-that oppressors until they’re ultimate exposed as liars about their own natures. And yes, porn is addictive. So if that’s a problem for you, take personal responsibility, get some treatment, and deal with it like one should for any addiction. Here’s a quick little fun game. When you read the next P25 excerpt in bold, replace the word “pornography” with “football,” and the language is pretty revealing and a bit amusing. Add in gambling and the whole package of the NFL, which behaves like a pornography invading every possible day of the week while claiming family values and military patriotism, feels obscene.

“Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime. Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.”

Man, Oh Man. That’s some Orwellian language right there.

But let’s move on to education, a favorite target of Right Wing despotism and fear.

This writer is a substitute teacher with five years of experience working in public schools from Pre-K through high school. I’ve earned high praise as a teacher for encouraging kids with a wide range of capabilities to learn the best way they can. I’ve also learned skills in classroom management and teaching correct behavior. But the P25 wants to blame public schools for somehow undermining parental authority. Let me clue you in on something. That’s about as far from the real problem as you can get. If anything, it is self-righteous conservative parents bitching about their kid’s grades and telling teachers how to do their job that is the problem. =P25 loves bitching about education because they hate it as a path to critical thinking, which is what public schools and colleges are supposed to do; help us learn to think for ourselves. Any parent that doesn’t agree with that is a control freak, and potentially abusive in their indoctrination habits, oppressive insecurity, and inadequate feelings of self-importance. There, we’ve said it. Schools have a balancing role in society. The idea that parents are perfect and own all rights to their child’s mind is a product of a deeply flawed tribal narrative.  

“In our schools, the question of parental authority over their children’s education is a simple one: Schools serve parents, not the other way around. That is, of course, the best argument for universal school choice—a goal all conservatives and conservative Presidents must pursue.

P25 won’t admit it, but ‘school choice’ is a euphemism for ‘we don’t want our kids to learn science or history that conflicts with our conservative beliefs.’

Just look at what comes next in the P25 Manifesto. This is what this entire document is about. It is equivalent to a Unabomber Level incendiary call to gut American society and replace it with a paranoid religious conservative dystopian version of reality. Look at what they fear most:

“The noxious tenets of “critical race theory” and “gender ideology” should be excised from curricula in every public school in the country. These theories poison our children, who are being taught on the one hand to affirm that the color of their skin fundamentally determines their identity and even their moral status while on the other they are taught to deny the very creatureliness that inheres in being human and consists in accepting the givenness of our nature as men or women.”

No, you specious bigots. The United States has a racist and bigoted history of discrimination that needs to be taught to be understood. Those who don’t learn from history are condemned to repeat it. If the Heritage Foundation lived up to its name, it would abide in that premise. Instead, its denials are a dishonest attempt to avoid conservatism’s deep role in the ugly aspects of our nation’s history. You’d rather lie to yourselves than admit that truth! The Heritage Foundation avoids our nation’s heritagebecause we are not a perfect country. Germany had the guts to apologize for the Holocaust. Gutless conservatives want to proclaim United States’ innocence in the face of all its transgressions. That is the sign of a deeply dishonest mindset.

The same thing goes for conservative, legalistic Christianity, a belief system long used to foment and support the ugliest forms of indoctrination and domination, especially of indigenous peoples. That bwing of religion focused on absolutism is evil in using its twisted version of God and Christ to marginalize people through biblical literalism and its supposed infallible authority.

“Of course, the surest way to put the federal government back to work for the American people is to reduce its size and scope back to something resembling the original constitutional intent. Conservatives desire a smaller government not for its own sake, but for the sake of human flourishing. But the Washington Establishment doesn’t want a constitutionally limited government because it means they lose power and are held more accountable by the people who put them in power.”

The eternal whine about government size is the originalist complaint that the “Founders” never intended for government to grow. That’s idiotic. As for being “accountable by the people who put them in power,” what was that event on January 6th about again? Was that a “constitutionally limited government” at work for the people? Or was that the product of a conservatively supported lying fascist trying to gut the government for selfish purposes. We know the difference. The Heritage Foundation is the organization that aggressively denies our nation’s laws.

“In the case of making the federal government smaller, more effective, and accountable, the simple answer is the Constitution itself. The surest proof of this is how strenuously and creatively generations of progressives and many Republican insiders have worked to cut themselves free from the strictures of the 1789 Constitution and subsequent amendments.”

This is utter nonsense. The worst offense when it comes to superseding the 1789 Constitution and its amendments is the conservative gutting of the Second Amendment by splicing it in half to give unrestricted gun rights to any Tom, Dick and Harry who wants to carry military-grade weapons around and conduct mass shootings of children in schools, people in churches, concertgoer and 4th of July parade crowds. The Second Amendment call for a “well-regulated militia” is the originalist value that should be restored.

“Consider the federal budget. Under current law, Congress is required to pass a budget—and 12 issue-specific spending bills comporting with it—every single year. The last time Congress did so was in 1996. Congress no longer meaningfully budgets, authorizes, or categorizes spending.”

Hey boys. Back when Clinton was President, he worked collaboratively with Republicans to balance the budget. Cross-party collaboration is how this is supposed to work. But the Tea Party radicalized the process and now MAGA extremists want to punish Americans for playing by the rules and make their own set of rules.  

“The term Administrative State refers to the policymaking work done by the bureaucracies of all the federal government’s departments, agencies, and millions of employees. Under Article I of the Constitution, “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.” That is, federal law is enacted only by elected legislators in both houses of Congress.”

How ironic. The conservative Supreme Court has, for the last decade, been making laws and imposing legislation right and left. So shut the hell up about Congress, P25. You’re way off base about this one.  

“This exclusive authority was part of the Framers’ doctrine of “separated powers.” They not only split the federal government’s legislative, executive, and judicial powers into different branches. They also gave each branch checks over the others. Under our Constitution, the legislative branch—Congress—is far and away the most powerful and, correspondingly, the most accountable to the people.”

Here’s a real winner of a statement. The Republican-led House is the least effective legislative body in the history of the nation, and the Republican-led Senate refused to affirm the impeachment of Trump for the insurrection. Stop the apologetics for an incompetent political travesty on the Right.   

“Unaccountable federal spending is the secret lifeblood of the Great Awokening. Nearly every power center held by the Left is funded or supported, one way or another, through the bureaucracy by Congress.”

Again, the US military once had an audit done and the accountants assigned to that task gave up. No one can tell where the money’s spent, what goes where, or what military-industrial contractors are benefitting the most.  

“Let’s be clear: The most egregious regulations promulgated by the current Administration come from one place: the Oval Office. The President cannot hide.”

And you see no irony in this statement when considering that Trump lied to the American people repeatedly about the threat of Covid? And that he golfed far more than he governed, and cheated at that? And his workdays started at 11:00 am to allow time to paint his face and execute his combover. And when presented with information it had to be summarized on one page so that his short attention span could handle it? And can he even read?

We’ve seen it all by now, and the President can hide. A ton. And Trump attempted coercion of Ukraine, and tried to hide it with obstruction of justice, to gain political dirt on his opponent Joe Biden. And, Trump engaged in election lies that led to an insurrection, and tried to hide that. He also hid Classified documents in his personal residence, and tried to hide that too. He tried to hide his scandalous relationship with a series of high-profile porn stars, including $130,000 payoffs as hush money, a case that is concluding as this piece is written. He also “hid” from the public a sexual assault years ago on a woman whom he defamed and now has to pay millions of dollars because he lied about it.

With all these clear indications of your pet president hiding the truth, what are you people at The Heritage Foundation doing beside kissing each other’s rings?  Oh wait. We’re about to see. You’re going to project all these faults on others. That’s the way you do it. You get your money for nothing and your chicks for free?

“A conservative President must move swiftly to do away with these vast abuses of presidential power and remove the career and political bureaucrats who fuel it.”

We’ve heard how you think this is supposed to work, but the incoming President is currently beholden to technology billionaires and Russian President Vladimir Putin, who dictates American foreign policy to a “conservative President” too damned weak yet patently narcissistic in his public shows of “strength” to stand up to authoritarians and wealthy figures he admires.

“As monolithic as the Left’s institutional power appears to be, it originates with appropriations from Congress and is made complete by a feckless President. A conservative President must look to the legislative branch for decisive action.”

Hey, Heritage biggies, what are you really talking about here? President Joe Biden stabilized the economy after Trump crashed it just like Obama did after Bush crashed it. And Reagan didn’t do anything good for the economy either! His buddie GHWB promise “no new taxes” but whoopsie doops! Many times now, Democrat Presidents saved America from economic devastation with steady hands and wise policy. There’s nothing monolithic about good governance. But Republicans don’t recognize it, so they blame others for the problems caused by conflicted ideology and religious denial.  

“Finally, the President can restore public confidence and accountability to our most important government function of all: national defense. The American people desire a military full of highly skilled servicemen and women who can protect the homeland and our interests overseas. The next conservative President must end the Left’s social experimentation with the military, restore warfighting as its sole mission, and set defeating the threat of the Chinese Communist Party as its highest priority.”

Does this statment mean The Heritage Foundation wants to start wars? Because that’s what Bush did after letting America’s guard down, allowing terrorist attacks in New York and DC, (including our Pentagon, for God’s Sake) and going to war on false premises and lies, conducting torture in the same cells used by Saddam Hussein, and generally messing around to the tune of $7T of unbudgeted war spending with no result but death and injury, mental suffering and PTSD for thousands of servicemen and women of all diversity spectrum willing to serve but deemed “suckers and losers” by the likes of Donald Trump, a draft-dodger.

“The next conservative President must possess the courage to relentlessly put the interests of the everyday American over the desires of the ruling elite. Their outrage cannot be prevented; it must simply be ignored. And it can be. The Left derives its power from the institutions they control. But those institutions are only powerful to the extent that constitutional officers surrender their own legitimate authority to them.”

Here’s a question for all your die-hard conservatives out there: What is “The Left?”

It’s people who believe trust that an understanding of the humanities, science, critical thinking and cultural equity are good things. Those are American values held closely by the Founding Fathers. So we have to surmise that it’s conservatism that undermines democracy when it chooses bigotry over equality, and fascism over democratic rule of law.

“To most Americans, this is common sense. But in Washington, D.C. and other centers of Leftist power like the media and the academy, this statement of basic civics is branded hate speech. Progressive elites speak in lofty terms of openness, progress, expertise, cooperation, and globalization. But too often, these terms are just rhetorical Trojan horses concealing their true intention—stripping “we the people” of our constitutional authority over our country’s future.

Perhaps it’s Time for a reality check, folks. Common sense does not mean acting like the world was created in six literal days, or that a global flood once covered the whole earth. We need to start with baseline concepts of reality if we’re going to discuss common sense.

And, when you talk about “openness, progress, expertise, cooperation, and globalization,” those are all aspects of the American experiment that promoted growth and international respect.  

“Instead, they believe in a kind of 21st century Wilsonian order in which the “enlightened,” highly educated managerial elite runs things rather than the humble, patriotic working families who make up the majority of what the elites contemptuously call “fly-over country.”

That’s quite a hard-on The Heritage Foundation has for the name “Wilson.”

Are they talking about that volleyball in the movie Castaway? Because that Wilson guy seemed like a good friend in a time of need, and America needs one of those right now. But also, no one on the Left calls middle America “fly-over country.” We live her. That’s a term invented by the Right to claim self-victimhood. Oh my gosh, they’re still bent over Wilson. Look at this.

“This Wilsonian hubris has spread like a cancer through many of America’s largest corporations, its public institutions, and its popular culture. Those who run our so-called American corporations have bent to the will of the woke agenda and care more for their foreign investors and organizations than their American workers and customers.”

There is no “woke agenda.” There is a commitment among respectful people to honor the personal autonomy of all people. We understand you’re either too stubborn or willfully ignorant to grasp that, but we know why. You’re profoundly afraid of people different than you––including young people, because THF is primarily angry old white men and batty bigoted control freaks––who want to punish people for being themselves rather than cowing to some whitewashed version of a Republican tombstone.

And take note, if you’re supposedlly “pro-life,” because when it comes to “cancer,” let’s recall who got rid of the vicious threat of “pre-existing conditions” as a determinant for who in American can get healthcare coverage and who can’t. The ironically “Darwinian” call by conservatives to exclude those with health problems from the healthcare system is a product of abjectly dismissive corporatism, not a liberal agenda. The real “death squads” acting on Americans are healthcare insurers denying claims and letting people die to collect more profits. If you couldn’t figure that out, that’s why the United Healthcare guy got shot. Got a clue yet?

Here goes P25 xenophobia next:

“Progressive policymakers and pundits in America either fail to understand this premise or intentionally reject it. They enthusiastically support supranational organizations like the United Nations and European Union, which are run and staffed almost entirely by people who share their values and are mostly insulated from the influence of national elections. That’s why they are eager for America to sign international treaties on everything from pharmaceutical patents to climate change to “the rights of the child”—and why those treaties invariably endorse poli- cies that could never pass through the U.S. Congress.”

Okay, you’re xenophobic. We get it. But collaborating with the world’s other nations on healthcare, for example, could help us prevent future pandemics. Obama planned for that and Trump gutted our agencies tasked with that purpose, then denied the threat of Covid and blamed everyone else for his lies and incompetence. He’s a vicious liar, that one. Selfish. Fearful. Narcissistic. Dismissive. A grifter willing to sell $100 Bibles made in China while screaming about Chinese influence on America.

“That’s why today’s progressive Left so cavalierly supports open borders despite the lawless humanitarian crisis their policy created along America’s southern border. They seek to purge the very concept of the nation-state from the American ethos, no matter how much crime increases or resources drop for schools and hospitals or wages decrease for the working class. Open-borders activism is a classic example of what the German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer called “cheap grace”—publicly promoting one’s own virtue without risking any personal incon- venience. Indeed, the only direct impact of open borders on pro-open borders elites is that the constant flow of illegal immigration suppresses the wages of their housekeepers, landscapers, and busboys.”

Illegal immigration went down during Obama’s presidency. Get a clue.

And you don’t get to cite Dietrich Bonhoeffer about “cheap grace.” This is a complete misuse of that term, and an ignorant one at that. Bonhoeffer stood up to the specific forms of fascism the Heritage Foundation and P25 are now proposing. He gave his life defending genuine Christian principles and proposed that Christianity should give up its religiosity and embrace the “this worldliness” of its Judaistic heritage. He did this because religious legalism in league with political fascism led to The Holocaust, in which Hitler stated, “We’re only doing to the Jews what Christianity has been doing for 1500 years.” So you fake Christians at the Heritage Foundation do not get to use Bonhoeffer as an example of your virtues. You are the precise opposite of everything he stood for.

But now, let’s look at your other abuse of Bonhoeffer’s words…

“Cheap grace” aptly describes the Left’s love affair with environmental extremism. Those who suffer most from the policies environmentalism would have us enact are the aged, poor, and vulnerable. It is not a political cause, but a pseudo-religion meant to baptize liberals’ ruthless pursuit of absolute power in the holy water of environmental virtue.”

On this subject you are absolutely wrong. The term “Environmental justice” describes how the poor and those of racial origins other than white peope are most often victims of pollution caused by industry and bad public policy. There is nothing ‘extremist’ about holding corporations responsible for these abuses accountable. But you flip it around casually to support your absolutely dishonest notions about “cheap grace.” You should be ashamed. Or do you have no shame, just a lousy grasp of theology and an addiction to stealing words from heroes to make yourself look heroic? You’re frauds. Just like Trump.

“At its very heart, environmental extremism is decidedly anti-human. Stewardship and conservation are supplanted by population control and economic regression. Environmental ideologues would ban the fuels that run almost all of the world’s cars, planes, factories, farms, and electricity grids. Abandoning confidence in human resilience and creativity in responding to the challenges of the future would raise impediments to the most meaningful human activities. They would stand human affairs on their head, regarding human activity itself as fundamentally a threat to be sacrificed to the god of nature.?”

Oh, so it’s still all about oil and gas, is it? And we know you think climate change “isn’t real.” That’s one more layer of terminal denial employed as an ideology of selfish profit-making and dismissal of accountability.

“The same goals are the heart of elite support for economic globalization. For 30 years, America’s political, economic, and cultural leaders embraced and enriched Communist China and its genocidal Communist Party while hollowing out America’s industrial base. What may have started out with good intentions has now been made clear. Unfettered trade with China has been a catastrophe. It has made a handful of American corporations enormously profitable while twisting their business incentives away from the American people’s needs.”

It’s frustrating to read statements like this when it was America’s corporations shipping jobs overseas in search of cheap labor while America’s unions were gutted first by Reagan and decades of corporatist dissolution. How Republicans try to claim the high road on this issue? Could you be any more specious about cause and effect? Yes, you can. So let’s see it.  

“For a generation, politicians of both parties promised that engagement with Beijing would grow our economy while injecting American values into China. The opposite has happened. American factories have closed. Jobs have been outsourced. Our manufacturing economy has been financialized. And all along, the corporations profiting failed to export our values of human rights and freedom; rather, they imported China’s anti-American values into their C-suites.”

What the heck does this mean… “Our manufacturing economy has been financialized.” Talk about Orwellian speak. Who taught you English? Do you just make things up to sound smart? Because you’re not sounding smart making statements like this that mean nothing.

But by the way, when it comes to American industry’s interests, President Joe Biden just blocked the sale of US Steel to Nippon in Japan. Democrats have stood by workers and manufacturers for decades, and Biden’s infrastructure investment is forward-looking and futuristic. Trump promised to bring back American jobs and did nothing.

“When the Founders spoke of “pursuit of Happiness,” what they meant might be understood today as in essence “pursuit of Blessedness.” That is, an individual must be free to live as his Creator ordained—to flourish. Our Constitution grants each of us the liberty to do not what we want, but what we ought. This pursuit of the good life is found primarily in family—marriage, children, Thanksgiving dinners, and the like. Many find happiness through their work. Think of dedicated teach- ers or health care professionals you know, entrepreneurs or plumbers throwing themselves into their businesses—anyone who sees a job well done as a personal reward. Religious devotion and spirituality are the greatest sources of happiness.”

This religious language is steeped in dog-whistle bigotry. If an individual must be free to live as his Creator ordained, then leave people alone. Stop legislating religious morals based on anachronistic values long debunked by biblical scholars willing to confront the age-old tradition leading to persecution of Jews, gay people, Black people, women and more. You’re hypocrites on every front.  

“The American Republic was founded on principles prioritizing and maximizing individuals’ rights to live their best life or to enjoy what the Framers called “the Blessings of Liberty.” It’s this radical equality—liberty for all—not just of rights but of authority—that the rich and powerful have hated about democracy in America since 1776. They resent Americans’ audacity in insisting that we don’t need them to tell us how to live. It’s this inalienable right of self-direction—of each person’s opportunity to direct himself or herself, and his or her community, to the good— that the ruling class disdains.”

You don’t even hear yourselves speak, do you? Everything you cite here is exactly what liberalism advocates. But because you disapprove of gay people, or don’t want to hold men accountable for causing abortions, or think that teaching real American history with all its abuses and genocide, racism, slavery, and Confederate treason is going to ruin young minds, you’d rather lie that it’s bigoted people who are beset by government and “the Libs.” That’s just perverse logic.

“Left to our own devices, the American people rejected European monarchy and colonialism just as we rejected slavery, second-class citizenship for women, mercantilism, socialism, Wilsonian globalism, Fascism, Communism, and (today) wokeism. To the Left, these assertions of patriotic self-assurance are just so many signs of our moral depravity and intellectual inferiority—proof that, in fact, we need a ruling elite making decisions for us.”

Americans were not “left to our own devices.” People in that era arrived through principles of Enlightenment, not religion, at a belief that America should be self-governing, not subject to a king’s rule. But conservatives of the day wanted to stick with Britain! You’ve been on the wrong side of history from the beginning, and now you’re gutting our constitution with a “Promise” of a ruling elite based on theocracy, fascist instincts and denial of the Constitution as proven by Donald Trump’s attempt to overthrow the government. Donald Trump is not a president for all people. He’s stated that emphatically.

“The promise of socialism—Communism, Marxism, progressivism, Fascism, whatever name it chooses—is simple: Government control of the economy can ensure equal outcomes for all people. The problem is that it has never done so. There is no such thing as “the government.” There are just people who work for the government and wield its power and who—at almost every opportunity—wield it to serve themselves first and everyone else a distant second. This is not a failing of one nation or socialist party, but inherent in human nature.”

There you go again, throwing words around to sound smart? It’s hilarious that you claim that there’s no such thing as “the government.” You’ve already spent thousands of word outlining what the government should be and needs to be, and haven’t even gotten to the part where you map out the dogmatic tactics you plan to employe. Interestingly, on review, the entire document created as Project 2025 amounts to a denial of its own existence because every contention is a dystopian dream that you’re somehow persecuted when the entire “plan” is to in turn… persecute, disenfranchise, punish, and depict “the other” as “the enemy within.” You’re clearly a paranoid pack of fools with an 8th grade grasp of civics, immature, and decidedly antagonistic.   

“Analogous pro-growth reforms for America’s voluntary civil society are also in order. America is not an economy; it is a country. Economic freedom is not the only important freedom. Freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and the freedom to assemble also represent key components of the American promise. Today, in addition to the problem of Big Tech censorship, we see speakers at universities shouted down, parents investigated and arrested for attempting to speak at school board meetings, and donors to conservative causes harassed and intimidated. The next conservative President must defend our First Amendment rights. “

When people are called to account for bigotry, lying about science, repeating disinformation as truth, claiming “alternative facts” (as Trump did) and generally trolling members of society as having “Trump Derangement Syndrome” to gaslight people into submission, they are not the persecutors you claim. They’re standing up for the freedoms you say you defend yet abuse. The Fox News Network paid $750 in defamation lawsuits to a election machine tech company it publicly maligned. And Trump earned fines of $450M for illegal business practices. These are the abuses evidencing real corruption. And those people shouted down at school board meetings? Free speech works both ways.

“Ultimately, the Left does not believe that all men are created equal—they think they are special. They certainly don’t think all people have an unalienable right to pursue the good life. They think only they themselves have such a right along with a moral responsibility to make decisions for everyone else. They don’t think any citizen, state, business, church, or charity should be allowed any freedom until they first bend the knee.”

Um, let’s review the evidence here when it comes to “all men are created equal.” First, it is religious beliefs that deem folks the “chosen people” of God. America’s history includes the ugly effects of Manifest Destiny used to commit genocide and hold slaves, both of which defied equality for all “men.” It was conservatives denying women the right to vote, and it’s conservatives to this day denying gay people the right to marriage, all based on “special status” of the Christian religion as a dictator of values for America. That’s unconstitutional.

“Conservatives have just two years and one shot to get this right. With enemies at home and abroad, there is no margin for error. Time is running short. If we fail, the fight for the very idea of America may be lost.”

Look at the fear and desperation and the acknowledged brevity of the entire P25 premise, which is this: impose thy will on others quickly before they see the lies upon which it is based. That’s why Trumpism and MAGA works. They are shallow, slogan-based claims to authority based on fear, willful ignorance, self-proclaimed victimhood and dystopian paranoia.  The Right Wing media leverages these fears for profits.
 

I think you included the following quote in the P25 doc, but it might have popped up somewhere else too. It’s appropriate describing what’s going on in America, but not in favor of P25.

Just two years after the death of the last surviving Constitutional Convention delegate, James Madison, Abraham Lincoln warned that the greatest threat to America would come not from without, but from within.

What GOP stands for these days

I looked up the history of the acronym GOP as a shorthand for the Republican Party. The Wikipedia page on the Republican Party says this:

“The term “Grand Old Party” is a traditional nickname for the Republican Party and the abbreviation “GOP” is a commonly used designation. The term originated in 1875 in the Congressional Record, referring to the party associated with the successful military defense of the Union as “this gallant old party”.

I’d always thought it stood for Grand Old Party, which is just as lame. But these days, the Republican Party is anything but Grand or Gallant. So the old terminology is moot. I propose that we give the GOP a new set of more accurate terms to replace its traditional claims to grandness or gallantry.

GOP and dying wishes

The option I propose, given the Republican Party’s tactics over the last fifteen years or so, is a far more accurate description of how the GOP operates. We’ll get to that in a moment.

But first, we need to understand the nature of the most recent hypocrisy. That is the installation of a third Supreme Court justice by decree of Donald Trump. We all recall how Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell self-righteously claimed that no President up for election within the year should be granted the right to nominate a Supreme Court judge. So McConnell blocked Merrick Garland’s nomination, only to invite Trump’s last-minute nomination of a constitutional originalist to replace the recently deceased Ruth Bader Ginsburg, whose dying wish was that her replacement would not be named until after the election.

The GOP has for decades been whining about so-called “activist judges” on the Supreme Court. Their concerns have focused on the idea that supposedly “liberal” justices are legislating “from the bench” by voting in favor of civil rights, economic parity, corporate responsibility and environmental justice in America rather than dragging the nation back to an interpretation of the United States Constitution before slavery was outlawed, women had the right to vote and America was a population of just 2.5M people. But here’s a fact that matters: The country is 130 times larger today according to the United States Census Bureau. We have fifty states, not just a few. We are a diverse nation thanks to immigration over dozens of decades and a couple centuries. The Constitution as it was originally written was never sufficient to cover all that change. The Founders knew that, which is why the power to commend Amendments to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were implemented. To ignore that wisdom is to kick the Founder right in their constitutional nuts.

Yet that’s what some in the GOP love to do.

Changing America

The idea that America is the “same place” as it was 243 years ago is an example of the controlling, abusive notion that all the Amendments and beneficial changes in law and policy installed since that time are meaningless affectations adopted by a whimsically feckless population of liberals.

Ironically, this country would not even have the Second Amendment if things had stayed fixed in place as Constitutional originalists would have it. On that subject, perhaps they’re correct that amendments can be used for ill-suited purposes. After all, America does not seem capable of managing “A well-regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state…” Now we’re being gaslighted by vigilante militias and the GOP, both who claim to represent an originalist interpretation of the Second Amendment that ignores that opening phrase in favor of the latter, “…the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

That is the gaslighting tactic (a lie by selective judgment) upon which activist interpretations of the Second Amendment now depend. As a result, Americans are literally being gaslighted to death by rampant gun violence in the streets, doctrinally motivated mass shooters armed to the teeth, and self-professed militia members playing soldier while claiming self-defense.

Why do all these people deep-down claim to want to arm themselves? Many claim that their armory is to prevent the government from having too much power. Here’s a sobering fact: more Americans have died from gun violence on American soil than all the soldiers killed in wars on foreign soils.

That means we are being gaslighted by the idea that guns are the path to safety in America. The people who make that claim (through the NRA, and other bodies) form one of the GOP’s pet voting blocs. Some equate even the idea of personal freedom with gun rights.

Yes, our country had to fight for its freedom to gain liberty from the rule of England. Guns are useful tools in war. That’s what they were invented for. That’s why a well-regulated militia truly is necessary for the security of a free state.

But it is principles, not guns, that form the true foundations of freedom.

Liberalism and democracy

It was liberalism and the determination that America should be independent from the rule of a king that established the country in the first place. There is also the issue that the nation’s Founders recognized the danger of establishing or enforcing a state religion, so the Separation Clause was written specifically to avoid the rule of one religion over the country.

These days the Christian evangelical community persists in claiming that the United States of America is a “Christian nation,” founded on “Christian principles” and therefore subject to the directives of theocratic directives from whatever source they might be issued. This is another form of gaslighting, a way to “manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity.”

Crazy times

These are crazy times we live in. To perpetually insist that something is true that is not true, especially by accusing those most affected by that untruth of being wrong, is psychological abuse. So is being a bully over every issue that confronts you. That is what the President of the United States does every single day of the year.

That is also the central tactic of the GOP these days. Choose any principle; be it racism, feminism, gay rights, environmental protection, even the rights of an individual in comparison to a corporation, and the GOP finds a way to flip those concerns around as a means to gaslight people into submission. Crazy times indeed.

Racism and the GOP

When it comes to racism, the GOP inherited the originally vicious views of Southern Democrats and turned into a voting bloc first exploited in dog-whistle fashion by the grandfatherly visage of President Ronald Reagan. The Southern Strategy persists through the era of President Donald Trump, whose open appeal to racists to gain votes for his re-election includes patronage and Retweets bragging that there are “good people” on both sides of the debate over civil rights in America. He doesn’t bother to explain what kinds of “good people” want to persecute blacks and send American citizens “back to Africa” or whatever racist taunt they choose to exhort, but Trump doesn’t care about such details. He is happy to gaslight principled citizens into questioning their own good judgment by wondering what the President means by describing angry white citizens as “good people.”

Blacks and police brutality

The scourge of police brutality toward black people in America is so longstanding and frequent that movements such as Black Lives Matter emerged to heighten awareness of the problem. But conservatives gaslighted the issue by pumping out alternative slogans such as Blue Lives Matter and All Lives Matter. Rather than address and acknowledge that 200+ years of racial suppression continues in this nation, the opponents of full civil rights for people of color selfishly claim persecution for themselves.This is gaslighting at its worst.

The GOP encourages this attitude of denial with its support of Trump and the specious slogan Make America Great Again. Those words are a dog-whistle act of gaslighting unto themselves. They insinuate that the advances in civil rights, environmental protection and religious equanimity established by the Constitution are illegitimate.

Constitutional originalism is gaslighting

Now the Senate has installed yet another constitutional originalist in the Supreme Court. This is an outright act of the sort of judicial activism against which the GOP has railed for decades. It is gaslighting in its most extreme political form.

That is what the GOP stands for these days: Gaslighting Over Principle.

We’re stuck with it for the time being, but there will come a moment in history when the tables turn again. That may come sooner or later. But gaslighting does win the day on November 3, the country as we’ve known it for 243 years will cease to exist, and we’ll all be subject to the violent instincts and abusive advances of a highly conflicted man and his dysfunctionally self-absorbed family.

That’s the choice we’re making on November the third. We can let ourselves be gaslighted into insanity, or we can stand against the GOP and its lying tactics, sycophantic whorishness and cloying lust for power, black eyes and all.

Is it time to ditch the paramilitary structure of the police?

A few years back while riding my bike in the country, I saw a green vehicle parked by the side of the road. The writing on the side said, “CONSERVATION POLICE.”

With an interest in the environment and especially our parks and natural areas, I stopped to talk with the officer at his vehicle. That probably doesn’t happen all that often. I noticed that he was a bit guarded in his demeanor. So I opened with a question, “Do people know what you do?”

He seemed to realize that I was either curious or genuinely knew the answer to that question. He smiled and said, “Between you and me, about seven out of ten people want to know what the Conversation Police do.”

Training and commissions

That speaks to a lack of knowledge and a level of paranoia that exists in society toward the police. As a writer I followed up on our talk by contacting the regional office for the State Conservation Police and wound up interviewing two officers, one a woman and the other a man, about the distinctive nature of their jobs.

What I learned is that State Conservation Police go through training to become fully commissioned state police officers. They also go through additional training for the specifics of their job in policing natural areas, parks and other situations in urban, suburban and country settings.

I learned that it’s not an easy job. I also learned that the police with whom I talked at the managerial level were open to the idea of communicating the breadth of the job handled by state conservation police officers. It’s true that many people do not understand the roles and challenges of police officers at the local, regional and state level.

Urban and exurban realities

After learning more about policing the wilder areas of our state and writing an article about it for a suburban lifestyle publication, I met a man that served as a police chief in a highly urban area west of Chicago. It was a tough town according to reputation. He’d spent many years rising through the ranks to become the Chief of Police. In classic police fashion, he was not overly communicative about the nature of his job. But after talking for an hour, I dared ask him a question that I’d long wanted to pose to a police officer in his position.

“What do police actually think about the problems of gun control?”

It was admittedly a question phrased in a liberal context. Yet he answered with sincerity. “We think it’s a mess,” he confided. “There are too many guns out there.”

One could immediately jump to a number of conclusions from that statement. Gun proponents might state that there are too many illegal guns in the urban environment where the officer was stationed. It is easy to ascribe patent gun violence to gang-bangers and such. That carries with it the implications of race. Yet the police officer with whom I spoke was himself African-American. He’d probably seen plenty of violence and law-breaking from people of all races and backgrounds.

Self-protection

But the culture of policing in America depends on guns as safety and protection for the officers. The result has been that as America’s volume and capacity of the weapons on the street has escalated, so has the need for police to arm up and defend themselves. When placed in circumstances where guns may be present or called into action, police are at risk in every situation from a traffic stop to breaking up a block party to watching prisoners in hospital settings.

So it’s really no surprise that people are being gunned down by the police. The sad, sick part of the equation is that the paramilitary structure of the police force with its hierarchy of command places police in a position of protecting their own as would any other form of unit committed to a battlefront. That’s what the United States of America has become. A nation at war with itself, and the police are supposed to act like the United Nations forces in blue helmets trying to keep the peace.

And frankly, it is too much to ask

Conflicting purposes

The police are clearly being asked to do too many types of things. From traffic control to domestic violence, handling mental illness in the public space to tracking down crime and violence, the police are expected to multitask like no one’s business. And frankly, no organization can handle that many options and be efficient and effective.

That’s especially true when the paramilitary structure demands loyalty, rigidity and compliance on the front end. Surely discipline is important to public and private policing. But discipline alone is too easily compromised when social or work pressures enter the picture. That’s when people become more concerned with covering their ass and keeping things quiet if things go wrong, rather than opening the subject to inquiry and consideration.

When political or racial bias further enters the picture, a paramilitary organization too easily becomes a tool of power and manipulation. When the culture of an organization adopts a prejudice of any kind, it conflicts with the assigned purposes of a police organization to serve and protect.

Tribalism and paramilitary mentality

That is how an officer decides to kneel on the neck of another human being long enough to kill them. And why fellow officers stand aside or even support that effort. There is too much tribalism built into the paramilitary model of the police forces of this country. That is not to say that the police are necessarily to blame. Who wants to risk their lives in a country where there are more guns than people? The perversion of the Second Amendment into a free-for-all of gun rights and vigilantism has turned policing into a losing proposition from the start.

The opening phrase of the Second Amendment holds the solution, too long ignored and debased by the likes of the NRA and its patsy politicians, that reminds us that, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state…” should not be dismissed as an unnecessary burden on the nation. More people have died from gun violence in the United States than all the soldiers killed in American wars on foreign soil. The nation is in the long grip of a gun violence pandemic and mass shootings that only abated for a bit once a disease pandemic came along to force people off the streets and out of the cycle of blasting each other to bits.

The POTUS and domination

The worst part of all this vigilante addiction to guns and force, and the paramilitary approach to society, is that the President of the United States even views our nation’s military as his personal police force. In a fascist response to public protests over the killing of multiple black victims by police, Trump proposed sending tanks into Washington, DC and other cities to “dominate” those he considers out of order. It is no surprise where Trump likely got the idea, as he put in a call to Russia’s President Vladimir Putin before launching the idea of this proposed assault on American society to protect his own racist agenda. Trump’s murderous instincts have included instructing police not to be too soft and to knock heads when doing their jobs. This is not the message America needs to hear.

Cities across America are now considering “defunding the police” which is an unfortunate term at best. The real goal is to restructure the approach and obligations of America’s police forces. The best place to start is changing the system from a hierarchy of paramilitary command to a more collaborative model similar to organizations where decision-making is more effectively crowd-sourced and includes contributions from all levels of an organization to hold everyone accountable and provide support where needed from top to bottom for police everywhere. Of course, the “tough guys” mentality of police work would resist this model as impractical and too soft. But what’s the better alternative? Remaining at war with the public in fear for the lives of the officers on the front lines, or acting with conscience and proving the Blue Lives really do matter?

Source: https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/perspective/perspective-evaluating-the-paramilitary-structure-and-morale

Why Trump Haters are for the birds

CedarWaxwing solo 3

Cedar Waxwing. Photo by Christopher Cudworth

Recently a long-ago classmate from high school showed up on Facebook. He Friended me and began complimenting bird photos that I posted to my wall. The connection for the first few weeks seemed genuine. He’d never been a nature guy to my knowledge but had lived next to a forest preserve back in the day. Perhaps his upbringing near the wilds had emerged as a deeper interest in his retirement.

He posted photos of his own, images of birds and such around his property. Then one day a cryptic post appeared on his wall. It was rife with jingoistic and politically flirtatious language that was all too familiar to me.

 

Bald Eagle Flight

Bald Eagle. Photograph by Christopher Cudworth.

He claimed at the moment to have a neutral stance on the state of the nation these days. Perhaps he was an Independent of sorts? Even a Libertarian? Over the years plenty of that cropped up in social media too.  And then there are the supposedly objective among us, who view all politics and government as the scourge of life. “They’re all crooks,” goes the line.

Meanwhile, the comments kept coming about nature and birds and such. He knew that I was a birder way back in middle school and high school, earning the not-so-complimentary sobriquet “Birdman” from friends who found the hobby ridiculous. So I continued our friendly repartee and helped him identify some species that showed up at his feeder from photos that he’d posted.

Trump shrug

Then came the Purple Post. My new-old-friend had decided to “lift the veil” on his political affiliations and made a statement to that effect with a closing statement: Vote Trump 2020.

I wasn’t shocked. But I was disturbed. My concerns were specific and real. If he claimed to love wildlife and the environment so much, how could he possibly support what Donald Trump has been doing to our country’s laws and regulations that protect clean air and water, conserve both common and endangered species, and honor key acts governing even archeological and paleontological resources?

The list of attacks on these protections is long. I call them the Trump Killers, because he’s presided over legal and political attempts to kill every one of these laws. Here are the major policies that Trump and the Republicans have set out to kill, or have killed already.

Trump KIllers

The point in posting this list is to help people connect the dots between the wildlife my supposed Facebook Friend loves to enjoy and the laws that provide protection and habitat for these living things to survive. That’s a simple enough concept, right?

Yet in Trumpian fashion, his love for Trump is so ardent yet so shallow that he likely has no idea that any of these actions are being taken. He lives near one of the few habitats where Kirtland’s warblers breed in Michigan. Birders have worked to help protect that and many other species. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act alone is designed to protect hundreds of species that travel to our country during spring and fall. Does he even know why such laws are important? Doubtful.

Too many Trump supporters appear to come from a background where science is considered a worthless opinion. Some of that stems from religious prejudice wrought from an evangelical mindset based on biblical literalism and its intellectually retarded offspring, creationism. Some 35% of Americans tend to abide in that worldview, and the consequence is that men like Trump and his greedy Republican allies grant carte balance to industrial polluters and environmental abusers because, it is claimed, the human race has dominion over the earth.

Bluebird 4

Eastern Bluebird. Photograph by Christopher Cudworth.

That is the absolute brand of cognitive dissonance at work in Trumpism. It aggressively fails to recognize the connection between these environmental and resource acts and our nation’s contribution to their survival. In other words, Trump supporters completely refuse to connect the dots between the things that actually make America great and the things Donald Trump does to destroy them. And if you question their passive-aggressive practice of posting provocative Pro-Trump memes and then whining when you challenge them, the first instinct is to gaslight all those with the gall to present evidence of the President’s own lies and contradictions of his own statements. They want to make you feel like it all never happened. “You must be crazy,” is the implication.

And sure enough, when I commented on my friend’s Purple Post, he immediately made a baiting statement that he “knew I’d be first to comment.” In other words, he was taunting me and others. Just as predictably, his Trump-loving friends chimed in with memes supporting Trump and ridiculing those who don’t “get it.”

And finally, one of those Trump Lovers branded me a Trump Hater.

Trump Maga Hat

That’s the “go-to” dismissal for all Trump supporters. It implies an irrational hatred for the President. It directly aligns with the so-called Trump Derangement Syndrome that Trump supporters use to paint those who oppose them as radical leftists who oppose true American virtues. But it’s interesting how many terms it actually takes to insult those who oppose Trump.

The hypocrisy in all this is quite evident. If a Trump supporter loves birds and wildlife but does not understand that the President is doing everything he can to gut laws protecting those resources, that’s plain stupid and irresponsible. And if a Trump supporter claims to value civil rights yet wants to deny those rights to gay people or people of color, that’s an insult to the entire notion of what civil rights mean. And if Trump supporters claim to love life yet refuse to limit access to weapons capable of slaughtering dozens of innocent people in minutes, then they are lying to us all.

That is the dynamic that exists across the entire spectrum of  Trump policies. Claims to virtue counteracted by repression of those whom the Trump world hates. And Trump himself is the most consistent lawbreaker. From breaching emolument laws on conflicts of interest to pressing foreign countries to interfere in our nation’s elections, Trump has flaunted our Constitution and its foundational premises. He refuses to respect the rule of law and at the same time uses it to punish those causes he considers his enemies. He is the most hateful acting of all Presidents, fueled especially by hatred for Barack Obama, whose legacy he has steadfastly and vengefully tried to erase.

bobolink

Bobolink. Photo by Christopher Cudworth

But it’s the birds that illustrate this whole hatred thing the best. Many of those laws listed above were actually implemented with collaborative approval by Republican Presidents and members of Congress and the Senate. But Trump hates them all. The real Trump Hater, in an active sense, is Trump himself.

So I’ll not abide the insults and the targeted claims that I’m somehow “deranged” for opposing the nasty things this President is imposing on our country. They are hateful in every respect, a testimony to the selfish and shallow fraud of a human being whose grasp of even the most simple concepts is at best questionable. Yet he calls himself a genius and brags about his intellect, all while gutting the purposes of our public education system, our civil rights and our heritage as a haven for the desperate and the poor. Donald Trump is the most hateful man on earth right now, and his supporters love him for it. Yet they call us Trump Haters.

Orange Donald

LAS VEGAS, NV – APRIL 28: Chairman and President of the Trump Organization Donald Trump yells ‘you’re fired’ after speaking to several GOP women’s groups at the Treasure Island Hotel & Casino April 28, 2011 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Trump has been testing the waters with stops across the nation in recent weeks and has created media waves by questioning whether President Barack Obama was born in the United States. (Photo by David Becker/Getty Images)

That’s a sickness of mind and an ugly testament to the twisted mentality required to vote and approve the actions of a President who is a bully, a despot, and a fascist in every aspect of his demeanor and conduct. In other words, he is a man genuinely worth of hate, but his supporters instead grant him a brand of worshipful love that resembles a cult.

Cardinal and Evil

So we supposed Trump Haters are for the birds, and many other good things in this world, including civil rights for all, a fair and equitable economy that does something other than shovel money to the wealthy, a foreign policy that respects rather than manipulates and brutalizes our allies, a nation free from religious oppression as guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, and a country where guns are not the final word on respect for law.

But those who love Trump apparently hate all these things, and hate the world as well, because they’re willingly glad to destroy it in order to keep their man in power.

The truth about Christianity and gun laws

FlagWaiver

One of the most vexing aspects of America’s gun laws is the apparent belief by many Christians that guns are compatible with their religion. That’s an interesting contention because guns were originally invented for one purpose: that is killing. Yet one of the most famous of the 10 Commandments is “Thou shalt not kill.” 

Jesus was keen on the idea that our thoughts and even casual intentions can lead to evil actions. In Matthew 5: 27-29 Jesus addresses these issues:

You have heard that it was said, ‘Do not commit adultery.’ 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman to lust after her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29 If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell.”

So Christians face a real dilemma when it comes to owning or carrying a gun. Even the “self-defense” argument often made on behalf of gun ownership denies the principle of placing one’s trust in God for protection. Either you trust God to protect you, or you don’t. God only knows your true heart. 

Who lays claim to the flag in America?

Given the difficulty of parsing out the religious conundrums wrought by owning guns, a great many Americans take refuge behind laws supporting gun ownership. The claim to be a “law-abiding gun owner” appears rock solid when defending the right to own and bear arms. Yet even laws are no guarantee of a reasonable conscience.

The example of Jesus

We should recall that when Jesus embarked on his ministry by preaching in the country on the heels of John the Baptist, a real revolutionary by nature, the goal was to bring the grace of God to all. Yet Jesus and his disciples soon made a practice of breaking the laws set out by religious authorities bent on imposing tradition on the populace. Jesus spoke out against this brand of authority and the hypocrisy it inevitably produced. He even called the lawmakers defending their tradition a “brood of vipers” for their habit of lashing out at anyone who opposed their version of authority.

Jesus challenged even the nature of the laws laid out by religious authority. When a band of accusers threatened to stone a woman to death in the streets for the crime of adultery, Jesus turned to them and said, “Let he that is without sin cast the first stone.”

Questions of judgment

That was an indictment of those issuing personal judgment of others. But it also resonated all the way up the legalistic food chain to the religious authorities who implemented those laws in the first place. Jesus was challenging a system that had been corrupted by selfish aims and misguidedly self-righteous intentions. It was the literal and legalistic interpretation of scripture that had led to traditions concerned more with obeying the laws of religion than keeping with the true heart of God. Jesus considered this an abomination, especially as it led to the commodification of the temple itself, which had become a hall of commerce, not a house of prayer.

So Jesus fought the religious authorities and turned over the tables of commerce at the temple. Yet we all know how the story turned out. Rather than consider what Jesus had to say about the corrupt nature of tradition, the religious authorities reacted with anger toward him for questioning their practices. Ultimately they conspired to have him killed  and even got someone else to do the dirty work of crucifixion. Thus they protected their reputation as the “good guys” who were defending the wholesome halls and hallmarks of tradition.

Christianity today

This is much the same position in which legalistic Christians find themselves today. They have sided with the gun lobby and conservative politicians who calculatedly ignore the first part of the Second Amendment, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary for the protection of a free state…”  while emphasizing the more selfish part of the law in the “right to bear arms.”

This is better known as “cherry-picking,” the practice of taking the parts of scripture or the Constitution that support your personal aims while discarding or ignoring those that do not apply or actually contradict your selfish aims. This is the grand habit of legalistic Christians who conveniently ignore anachronistic laws in the Bible even while claiming its inerrancy and infallibility. This is the principle lie of Christian apologetics in this day and age. It also happens to be the principle lie of constitutional originalists as well. Thus it is no coincidence that we often find political and religious conservatives in allegiance to their parallel beliefs even to the point of claiming these worldviews trump all other forms of truth.

The gun lobby

FIREARM

The gun lobby in America certainly welcomes Christian support of its commercial and political aims. So does the NRA, which frequently presents itself as the chief authority on gun laws and rights in America.

But that leaves the rest of us to wonder about people who deny the truth of both their religion and the United States Constitution that clearly states guns must be well-regulated as part of a well-regulated militia.

The purposeful denial of this patently important introduction is executed in order to make the selfish claim that gun rights are by nature sacrosanct to American tradition and protect the very freedoms upon which America depends as a republic.

Yet how do we tell that to thousands of people that are mowed down by guns every year? Many of the guns used to conduct shootings are designed not just for killing, but for mass killing, sometimes taking multiple lives within 30 seconds of opening fire. And how do we tell that to the families to whom “thoughts and prayers” are so frequently directed…yet never really console them because their loved ones are the bloodied and dead victims of an extremely selfish interpretation of the Second Amendment that allows such events to happen.

Christians of conscience who actually know and understand the history of their religion should know better. But as we learned from the religious authorities who conspired against Jesus because he broke their laws and resisted their traditions, those in charge may claim to be on the right side of the law, but they are also frequently on the wrong side of history, and of God.

 

America has been sold a “bill of goods” on gun rights

bill of goods

n.pl.bills of goods

1. consignment of items for sale.
2. Informal A plan, promise, or offer, especially one that is dishonest or misleading
It is stunning to hear politicians in the wake of yet another mass shooting say that it is “too soon” after the tragedy to talk about the problem of guns in America.
But it is just as disturbing in the wakes of repeated mass shootings, including 26 dead and more wounded in a Texas church, for God’s Sake, to hear the likes of actor James Woods throwing around shallow opinions about what constitutes responsible gun control.
His defense of the NRA in the wake of these mass shootings was breathtakingly shortsighted.  Woods Tweeted that none of the mass shootings of the last few decades were conducted by a member of the NRA.
NRA shooters.jpg
What James Woods cites as “actual facts” about NRA members never having been involved in mass shootings may or may not be true. But that is hardly the central point in the current debate about gun proliferation in America.  The NRA as spent decades promoting the idea that gun rights should not be restricted in any way. person. Even President Donald Trump, a noted kiss-ass for the NRA and its constituents, favored the recent removal of a law that blocked access to gun ownership for people with mental health issues.
Yet after the Texas shooting, Trump rushed to claim that the shooter was mentally ill.
So which is it? Are we concerned about people with mental illness having access to guns with which they can murder two dozen people in minutes? Or is the NRA correct in asserting that no amount of gun control can prevent such wanton slaughter?
To hear James Woods tweet, the bloody massacre of 26 people in a Texas church is of not the concern to the NRA since no NRA member committed the crimes. At what point do we point out the massive case of cognitive dissonance at work on gun rights in America?
Public emergencies
Consider the fact that mass shootings constitute a public emergency. Cities and towns across America dread the day that violence comes to visit them. Police and government officials set up entire protocols to manage gun violence of any kind. The structure of these protocols is always designed to define who is in charge, and who has authority and responsibility to act in the fact of violence, terror attacks, and other public threats.
The reason why public agencies work so hard to define who is in charge is to avoid confusion during times of public emergency. The parallel goal is to prevent mistakes in the face of terror or violence and manage the risks of even greater harm taking place.
Friendly fire in America?
Even America’s military struggles at times to avoid gunfire from taking out their own personnel. The most famous case of so-called “friendly fire” was that of former NFL player Pat Tillman who died in action not from the bullets of the enemy, but from his own military.
Yet the NRA has been a big proponent of the idea that Concealed Carry laws can prevent crime. The idea behind Concealed Carry is that the presence of “good guys with guns” will somehow act as a deterrent to violent gun crimes. Some gun proponents think the law does not go far enough in that regard. Those gun advocates insist that only Open Carry does the real job of deterring violence. Which means, if you open the pages of that action-based manual, a completely militarized society in which everyone is allowed to visibly carry weapons anywhere they want to go.
False heroes
Gun proponents are jumping on the fact that a couple Texas yahoos chased down the killer of all those people the killer shot up in the church. One of them opened fire before the chase and may have wounded the killer before he got into his car and embarked on a 90-mile-an-hour escape attempt that ended in a crash and his death. Whether he died from gunshot or the crash is not fully apparent. But gun proponents seem eager to claim the heroics of the two gun-toting vigilantes.
Somehow, twenty-six people still died in that church. The killer was walking down the aisles shooting crying babies. Some people struck by gunfire played dead and avoided further attack by the assassin. Who was not, according to James Woods, an NRA member. And that makes it all okay?
The Bill of Goods
The cognitive dissonance at work in all this the Bill of Goods we’ve been sold by the NRA. There is absolutely no substance to the argument that because the NRA cannot be finger-pointed for these and other killings, the organization, its members and the politicians who vote against gun controls bear no responsibility for the wanton slaughter of Americans that goes on every day.
So let’s walk this through in a clear and simple fashion. What the NRA has proposed and still supports is the idea that Concealed Carry laws are a specific deterrent to gun crimes, and that everyday citizens bear the responsibility (therefore) of engaging with any form of aggression they may encounter. It remains the sole right of that individual citizen to determine what the nature and level of that threat may be. There is no call to a superior authority required under this system. It is, in a word, a free-for-all on the streets of America.
Protocols
This contrasts starkly with the protocols of emergency and terror management standards all across America. Police, fire and other paramilitary organizations involved in the protection of public safety all have well-established systems of authority and even processes firmly structured to share andr delegate authority in situations of true emergency or terror.
That means there’s a big hairy gap between what the NRA is advocating as the correct interpretation of the Second Amendment as it relates to the life and liberties of everyday Americans. The NRA conveniently ignores the first and qualifying phrase of the Second Amendment, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state…” in favor of the more selfish and individualized interpretation of the second phrase, “The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
Lopsided interpretations
Constitutional originalists should be aghast at the destruction of that sentence as a wholly vested expression of law as it pertains to gun ownership. But the Supreme Court in its conservatively lopsided obsession with ‘personal rights’ has been an enabler to all people like James Woods who refuse to be held accountable for anything but their own selfish interests.
As a result, we do not have a “well-regulated militia” at all. That intention of the Founding Fathers has been tossed on a junk heap of Twitter-infused jingoism equating unrestricted gun rights with real freedom in America.
This lie has been exposed over and over, but it has been repeated so often the layers of gun fetishism cannot even be peeled back. This fetishism for guns is rampant as John Lennon pointed out more than forty years ago in his song Happiness is a Warm Gun:
When I hold you in my arms (oh, yeah)
And I feel my finger on your trigger (oh, yeah)
I know nobody can do me no harm (oh, yeah)
Because, (happiness) is a warm gun, mama (bang bang shoot shoot)
Happiness is a warm gun, yes it is (bang bang shoot shoot)
The security about which Lennon sang is, in reality, the massive insecurity of gun fetishists whose fearful worldview insists that only guns provide real protection from harm in this world. They must lie to themselves and even call the government itself a threat in order to sustain the pathetic lack of trust they have in fellow citizens.
Shallow concerns
In the end, this is what it’s all about. James Woods laid bare the shallow concerns of the selfish, insecure fears of an American populace that cannot manage to function without a finger on the trigger and while packing heat. But despite what James Woods says about NRA members, their fingers share the pressure of every trigger pulled in violent acts against fellow Americans. There is blood on their hands despite the fact that no supposed NRA member is doing the physical shooting. The NRA and its members have created, sponsored and supported the lack of accountability in the legal destruction of the first phrase of the Second Amendment in favor of a second, far more selfish interpretation that says bearing arms “shall not be infringed.”
Tell that to the thousands of first responders, the police and other emergency workers who do abide by the authority of a “well-regulated militia” in America. That’s how our public servants function, by the authority vested in the structure of a well-regulated militia.
But the NRA boldly ignores that fact, favoring instead the ugly vigilantism and unrestricted access to guns for those well-beyond the selfish political party we call the NRA. The organization and its supporters wash their hands of crimes every day in order to protect their supposed status as “pure” gun owners incapable of such violence. The fact of increasing violence by the police toward the public is is a direct result of the NRA’s wanton disregard for the safety of all citizens in America. The police are simply in the line of fire of the cognitive dissonance wrought by wanton disregard of the “well-regulated militia” phrase in the Second Amendment.
Moral perspective
For moral perspective, we can turn to the tenets of the Christian faith to debunk the seflish, deceitful lies of the NRA and its terror-driven impact on human life.
Jesus confronted all those that he perceived to ignoring the works of evil or worse, misleading the easily deceived into dreams of power and authority where it was not warranted. Jesus also condemned those who twisted the law to serve their own purposes, and who created stumbling blocks from legalistic ideology that prevented people from seeing or encountering the truth. All these are characteristic of the sins of the NRA.
Way back when, Jesus branded people like these “hypocrites” for lording themselves over others. He called them a “brood of vipers” for their calculating ways and chastised them for the offenses they imposed on the culture at large. Jesus would not, in other words, like the NRA or James Woods one bit.
James Woods and the NRA are selling America a hollow “bill of goods” on gun rights versus true freedoms in America. They have lied by method of exclusion, and they are avoided responsibility for gun violence by method of inclusion.
Hypocrites. Brood of Vipers. All of them.

Simple proof that America is at war with itself

The Chicago Tribune news coverage following the Las Vegas mass shooting included a story quoting off-duty police officers trapped in the mayhem where 59 people were murdered and hundreds more were injured when the calculating gunman perched himself in a tall hotel to take aim with scopes and guns reconfigured as automatic weapons.

Some of the off-duty police officers had also served in the military. Those that had seen combat were still shocked by the scene of women shot through the head and people bleeding out as they lay on the ground wounded or dying from the effects of a man with plenty of ammo and deadly aim.

Combat statement.jpg“I have been in combat, but I have never seen this type of mass casualty,” said police Sgt. Michael Gonzalez.

The Las Vegas shooting may have been massive in scope, but it was just a bump in the pulse of bloody shootings taking place every day in America. There is no more denying the fact. The nation itself has become a combat zone. The United States of America is literally at war with itself.

The statistics of all the deaths caused by gun violence back this up. More Americans have now died from gun violence on home soil than all the soldiers ever killed in combat in foreign wars.

This is the direct product of the murderously blind activism of the conservative Supreme Court that wields its judgements like a weapon of the vigilante ideology favored by both the NRA and the politicians it has bought and sold. The inexcusable complaint that gun control measures are an infringement of the “right to bear arms” is disrespectful to the Constitution as a whole. When people own the right to steal the life of another human being in the blink of a trigger pull, there are no equal rights to that. There is no freedom in America.

Concealed Carry poison

The right to kill has bled into Concealed Carry laws that have poisoned the nature of freedom across the country. Think about it. The person standing next to you could well be packing the cold-hearted tool of your own demise. Say something wrong to them, or conduct some unintended slight that they judge to be a threat to their person, and they can claim the right to shoot you. Right in the head if they feel like it.

It is inconceivable that the Founding Fathers ever intended this to be the presiding scenario in America. In essence, we’ve been drawn back into an era when dueling was used to settle difference, or when gunman lined up in the street (supposedly) to draw weapons and fire. That’s what the NRA has promoted as the safest brand of citizenship in America.

Ignorant claims of so-called “responsible gun owners”

Don’t you see the ignorance of these claims? When laid bare, they have no constitutional foundation at all. They do have money behind them, and people selfish and angry enough at their plight in life to abide such foolishness. Meanwhile supposed “responsible” gun owners cower behind the controversy hoping the band of idiots at the forefront of the “more guns” debate will cover their fearful asses.

Because that’s what rampant gun ownership is all about. Fear. The United States is rife with chickenshits who feel like they can’t walk down the street or mingle with other human beings without carrying a gun on their person. This is the opposite of courageous. It is the parallel of insanity.

The bleeding and dying

That police officer who carried bleeding, dying people off the concert grounds knows now that America is a literal war zone. He saw it with his own eyes. He compared it to what he saw in actual combat, in real wars, and this was far worse.

The Second Amendment needs to be clarified. Re-balanced. We need a hard, strong definition of what a “well-regulated militia” looks like, and how it functions. We should no longer leave that to the addle-brained conservatives on the Supreme Court to decide. They have originalism blindness. They couldn’t muster their way out of a cardboard box if the writing on the inside mentioned guns in any way.

But our gutless Congress and Senate when run by Republicans is even worse. Their long term claim that government is the enemy of the people is the knife to the gut of common sense. If that’s the case, they should commit hari-kiri and get out of office. If you don’t believe in the merit of government, you have no right or ability to serve.

Cognitive dissonance

We live in a combat zone of cognitive dissonance. And innocent people are dying every day as a result. Screw the gun lobby. We don’t need any more evidence to re-write the Second Amendment, or repeal it altogether. The frightening reality is that we’ve seen  Presidents succumb to gun violence several times already. Even that conservative pet Ronald Reagan got blasted by a freeloading gunman back in the day. Gerald Ford was a target too. We lost JFK. His brother Bobby. We lost Martin Luther King, Jr. And we even lost John Lennon.

Imagine that. If Happiness is a Warm Gun, America has burn marks on its holster side.

What will it take for an admission of the combat zone that America has become? Does another President need to become a martyr for the nation to wise up? That might wake up the close-minded. The backwoods and front-office gun nuts, selfish and obsessed with weapons as a sub-culture.

It’s a sickness. An addiction. But like that soldier who comes home to find life at home too quiet, it seems the gun nuts of America fear the quietude they might face if they can’t wave a weapon in yours. That’s the worst angst they can imagine.

 

At least 50 dead, 400 wounded and what terrorist organization is to blame?

Spilled bloodThis Las Vegas shooting was massive. Death and destruction. A lone shooter armed like a soldier and able to shoot dozens of people in an extremely short amount of time. He killed 47 more innocent lives than the Boston Marathon bombing. He traumatized literally thousands present at the concert as well as millions of people reading about the massacre right now.

At this stage in America’s history, the motivations for shootings no longer matter. They are all part of a long line of public murders that terrorize the nation for a moment and then sink into the lexicon of ‘business as usual in America.’

There will be police reports filed, but to what avail? There were even off-duty police officers killed. It would not have mattered if every citizen at the concert was armed. They were outgunned from the start and mayhem would have ensued if people started opening fire if some sort of martial law shootout had taken place.

There is only one terrorist organization to blame for this state of existence in America. That is the NRA. The constant effort to loosen gun laws and proliferate access to powerful weapons across America is an act of terrorism from within the system. The NRA has twisted and inflated the meaning of the Second Amendment to suit the profit motives of the guns and ammo industry. Millions of people have bought this perverse logic and turned our nation into a corrupt from of government in which the selfish rights and acts of a few dictate the public safety of all.

While conservatives wring their hands over Muslim influence in America and worry about the potential for Sharia law, they simultaneously ignore the massive carnage being perpetrated in America by gun owners, legal and otherwise. On average more than three times the number of people who died during the 9/11 attacks are killed by guns in the United States each year. That’s 152,000 Americans since 2001 that have died at the hands of the NRA. The complicit politicians across this nation who refuse to take responsibility for the in-house are also to blame. The terror manufactured and carried out is almost treated with a sense of pride by the false patriots who cower behind the supposed power of the Second Amendment.

The reason nothing is done about rampant gun violence is simple. The real cowards in America are those who refuse to admit they are scared for their own lives based on racial fears, gross insecurity toward their neighbors and their own government. They also fear looking stupid in the eyes of the bullies who run the NRA and its insidious tentacles. Thus the aggressive gun components in America are like captives exhibiting the Stockholm Syndrome. Cultlike. Sick and confused.

It’s time to call it what it is: the NRA is a domestic terror organization. And all those who support it, abide it or live without conscience by the lax laws it has created are accomplices in a plot against the sovereignty of this nation.

Is it time to take guns away from the police?

FIREARMYet another shooting of an unarmed man by police has taken place in Florida. The incident heightens the fact that police are using their weapons too freely.

Which means that perhaps the police need to have their guns taken away. 

The police are stuck between a rock and a hard place. If they don’t have weapons, they’ll get shot by people who do. And if they use their weapons too quickly, they get blamed for using too much force. So let’s do the rational thing and protect the lives of police officers. Let’s take their weapons away.

This might seem counterintuitive to some. The police need guns to protect themselves, right? In fact, taking away guns from police holds real potential to illustrate just how far the nation has gone in granting gun liberties to so many people. The number of weapons with power and potential to kill has escalated, if not by number, then by meaning. It’s all escalated thanks to the unwillingness of gun advocates to limit the purchase of military-grade guns. And our police are paying the price of that judgement.

Aggression, fear and response

In Great Britain, most police do not carry guns. In situations where gun violence is threatened, police are forced to use patience and numbers to disarm gun offenders.

Somehow, it largely works. But in America, we’re so far out of balance the police are opening fire in some cases before they even ask questions of suspects. The police fear for their lives, so they shoot first and in many cases don’t even bother to ask questions later. Their subjects are in the hospital, or dead. That feels like a solution to gun crime, but’s only a solution to the threat of a gun. It belies the meme that “guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” The mere threat of a gun on a person is enough to get police to shoot first. It’s the idea of guns that is causing police aggression and fear.

Concealed Carry lies

In America, the reason why Concealed Carry laws were installed was to give regular citizens the supposed power to defend themselves against whatever they perceive as threats. There are as many guns as citizens in America right now. So the problem of gun crime should be solved by now, correct?

Instead, the unpunished gun violence being perpetrated by police in America has our public servants increasingly viewed as a threat to public safety.

So let’s take the guns away from the police. Retrain them to rely less on guns. Makes sense.

And if violence and gun deaths escalate, we’ll know for sure the falsity in claims that Concealed Carry laws are a suitable solution to “maintain the peace.”

Changing expectations

We need police officers to carry out the law. But we need to change the expectations placed upon them by society. Heading out to enforce that law when they essentially expect to engage in gun battles in order to subdue suspects is causing many officers to operate under conditions so stressful they have resorted to a distorted view of reality in dealing with potential lawbreakers. That’s how racial profiling evolves as a tool for identifying suspects. It is a convenient and yet ignorant handle by which police feel they can gain control over their thankless jobs.

But the truth is sad. Profiling gives police a target more than it gives them insight.  

It’s really no different than the soldiers sent to Iraq with Rules of Engagement that prevented them from firing at will. Well, the enemies or terrorists or fearful everyday citizens they encountered did not have that playbook at hand, or abide by it. So our soldiers were not fighting a battle they could win.

And that’s because the war in Iraq should have been a police action reliant upon increased and aggressive diplomatic engagement. Not war.

So the parallels are evident in the manner in which we throw our police into situations where their lives are threatened by the proliferation of guns and the militarization of our society. They operate in what are essentially terror zones. These might be urban neighborhoods, but they also might be country farms where people obsessed with paramilitary psychology and hatred for the government consider police a tool of evil.

The NRA doesn’t care about police

The NRA has been no help in protecting the lives of our policeman. So let’s take the police completely out of the gun formula and bring them back into the realm of sanity. Let’s take away their guns.

What will this accomplish? It will illustrate the dangerous social imbalance created by our prevailing gun laws. Concealed Carry and Open Carry are nothing more than veiled attempts to install vigilante justice. They give license even to supposedly law-abiding citizens to take the law into their own hands. People get killed by those who determine for themselves what they consider a threat, and what the law means.

An unarmed police force

An unarmed police force will likely be converted into a considerably more cautious and respectful police mission. And if confronted by aggression with guns in the public, these situations must be 1) avoided until numbers can arrive 2) documented and 3) reported in full with the media. We’ll have real statistics on who is doing the shooting.

And what happens when mass shooters attack everyday citizens? That’s indeed a job for a militarized unit trained to confront terrorists and other heavily armed assassins. The regular police are generally unable and ineffective when confronted by mass shooters armed with machine guns and other military-grade weapons. Yet it’s become so common it is not hard to identify the need and level of force necessary to take out a crazed or determined shooter. Get the police out of harm’s way in those situations. Call in the weapons pros if need be. If citizens are going to militarize themselves and attack society, then we need to confront the enemy within our borders.

But we should also seek to disarm or prevent those unhinged from normal society by putting strict controls and measurements equal to attaining a driver’s license in society. All guns should be trackable, and any every gun, just like every car in America, is the responsibilty of the owner with legal consequences if weapons are stolen or used for insane purposes.

Accountability

Advocates of the current advocates of gun rights as they stand must be held accountable for each and every instance of gun threats against the police. If these outnumber a reasonable social balance in America, then the laws that govern the nation pertaining to gun rights must be changed. That is the only way to gain some sensible perspective on these issues.

And if police forces object to these standards in having their guns taken away, then it also illustrates the fact that our current gun standards are inadequate to provide civil protections.

Taking guns away from police will no doubt illustrate the insane idea that arming every citizen to the teeth is a protection for American society. We’ve known for too long that when both the police and the public are equally armed, the police will always be outnumbered.

Sold a bill of goods

 

Because honestly, according to the manner in which our Constitutional gun laws have been interpreted, it is the duty of regular citizens bearing weapons in Concealed Carry to mete out justice and protect themselves from other people with guns. That’s the narrative we’ve been sold by the NRA, and it has profited their constituents, the gun manufacturers and ammo dealers. So let’s force their hand. Take guns away from the police, and document how that goes. If the NRA is correct, peace will reign in America because millions of law-abiding gun owners will police the streets in place of our unarmed police.

So let’s force their hands and show them we care about the police. Take guns away from the police, and document how that goes. If the NRA is correct, peace will reign in America because millions of law-abiding gun owners will police the streets in place of our unarmed police.

Then let’s see how brave, intelligent and Constitutional our gun laws really are. Chaos has a way of pointing out the truth. Perhaps that’s what it will take to blast the truth into gun zealots and their militarized police buddies.

 

 

The patent neurosis of Concealed Carry

Neurosis: a relatively mild mental illness that is not caused by organic disease, involving symptoms of stress (depression, anxiety, obsessive behavior, hypochondria) but not a radical loss of touch with reality.

Guns_1000Last night while listening to the Sam Roberts show on Sirius radio, the discussion centered around the latest killing of a black man by a cop in Minnesota. Roberts struggled to show respect to the nation’s police whose culture centers on protecting their own whenever a difficult choice or a public relations crisis hits an officer that has used excessive force. While discussing the issue with a New York state trooper who called into the show, Roberts stated, and I paraphrase: “You need to get the good cops to start saying they do not support this kind of behavior.”

To which the cop replied, “There were 50,000 black people stopped today, and this was the only incident of its type. The rest were all handled well and people went home.”

It should not be too difficult to see the imbalance in that arithmetic. Why are 50,000 black people per day being stopped by police? What type of profiling is going on that leads to that kind of suspicion? Doesn’t that level of interaction generate reasonable suspicion about the motivation of police, even resentment? And aren’t the odds actually in favor of the fact that something bad is eventually going to happen when that many people are essentially being haggled every day?

Acceleration

From a broken tail light to a murder. That’s how one of these police interventions just turned out. And the reason? That’s simple too. Cops are afraid for their lives. The New York state trooper admitted as much. “We don’t know what’s going to happen on any traffic stop,” he intoned.

The discussion then turned to the fact that when a driver has a gun in their vehicle, it is their responsibility to inform the office right away. “At that point,” the trooper explained (again in paraphrase)  “it is the responsibility of the Concealed Carry citizen to inform the officer and turn over their weapon to the police.”

Now we can actually see how dangerous the world has become because of laws like Concealed Carry. Combined with weapons carried illegally, Concealed Carry laws have upped the ante on the presence of guns all across America.

Self defense?

Concealed Carry advocates love to cite the right to carry weapons in case of the need for self-defense. But what about our police? To those chartered with enforcing the law, Concealed Carry adds an entirely new level to the fear of being gun-whipped at a normal traffic stop. So let’s stop for a moment and think about the term Concealed Carry. That literally means you can legally hide a weapon on your person. How are police supposed to know if a gun is legally or illegally carried? If everyone has the right to hide a weapon on their person, there is no safe place in America.

Concealed Carry has created an additional layer of legal burden and a threat to civil order on all of society. Which makes it quite ironic the law is so favored by conservatives, who purportedly hate regulations of any kind. Yet the unintended consequence of Concealed Carry is that law enforcement is now trapped in a situation where the power balance is exceedingly in the public’s favor. Concealed Carry has forced an entirely new layer of inquiry to every police stop in the country. But the real fact is even more disturbing: The police are literally outgunned, outmanned and out of control all across the nation.

Militarization

In response, the police have had to militarize to counteract the number of weapons now owned by Americans legally and illegally. They have also been forced to change their culture to one of patent aggression. That’s just to save their own lives. That’s why cops throw people to the ground, cuff them automatically or use tasers to subdue those who question their arrest. If you stood at risk of being shot by any citizen that you stop, wouldn’t you do the same thing?

The reason why Concealed Carry was passed, and why there are now more guns than citizens in the United States, is that the patent neurosis of gun ownership has been promoted in America by a selfish and well-funded minority that purposely confuses fear with freedom. The reason for that approach is that fostering fear is a highly profitable venture for gun manufacturers and politicians who get elected by backing the self-interest of those who chose to live in fear. The net result is that attitude has been forced on American society, which has succumbed to the collective neurosis with Concealed Carry laws. Just like slavery which was once a legal and supported aspect of American society, Concealed Carry is sold as beneficial to society and something the nation cannot do without. As a result, we are all slaves to the gun industry and its henchman.

But let’s step back and take a rational look at this dynamic that the idea that people have to carry weapons in order to enjoy the basic rights of American citizenship. That is plainly neurotic, and possibly manic. We thus live in a bipolar society created by those who are depressed by the idea of not having enough weapons. Yet there are more guns than people in the United States. Neurotic.

Mental illness

One of the excuses given for mass shootings by gun lobbyists is that most are committed by people that are mentally ill. Yet mental illness can be manifested in many ways. The structure of a fear-based society dependent on guns is a reflection of a collective neurosis. We know this because other societies in the world are able to function without such proliferation of guns. And in societies such as Australia where weapons such as assault rifles have been banned, the number of mass shootings has been greatly reduced. That leaves America standing alone in a global society, violent as a crazed and jealous cousin at a family reunion.

We also know there is mental illness afoot when gun advocates refuse any responsibility for the crimes perpetrated by other gun owners. Where is the remorse for those gunned down by police when those attacked are clearly innocent? Instead, gun proponents hide behind the shock of the event and say, “It’s too soon to talk about gun control in the wake of this tragedy. We need time to process and let cooler heads prevail.”

But now the shootings simply overlap from week to week and even day to day. Last night in Dallas, Texas, snipers opened fire on Dallas police and killed five officers in cold blood. And guns are not the problem?

Neurosis as a way of life

Organizations such as the NRA have shown no sincere commitment to this problem. Instead, they advocate even more guns as the solution to the problem.  NRA supporters speak in terms of fear to defend their position that Concealed Carry is a necessary layer of protection in America. And hidden behind those fears, but not very well, is the patent racism shown by both the police in their arrest methods and by society in blaming blacks for the majority of crime.

Yet the predominant number of mass shootings in America have been committed by neurotic and perhaps psychotic white males. The gun lobby absolutely refuses to connect its collective neurosis with the pattern of psychosis driving shooters to act on their imagined power by using weapons in the streets, at shopping malls, even public schools and theaters. But we’ll say it here: the collective neurosis of rife gun ownership simply becomes too powerful for some people to resist. They can kill easily using guns, and guns are easy to obtain, so they go do it. There’s nothing magical about that. The neurosis of our gun mentality creates a straight line equation.

Invented for killing

Guns were invented for killing. There is no getting around that fact. They would never have been invented had it not been the need to kill more efficiently in war. That history, and the collective neurosis that leads to all violent wars, is the reason why America is at war with itself.

“But I’m not neurotic!” you can hear the panicked voices of so-called law-abiding gun owners complain. And that may be true, to an extent. Yet the collective neurosis that led to Concealed Carry laws across the nation affects us all. It is plainly paranoid to need to carry a weapon around with you. It’s a sign of social stress when a person cannot deal with society on anything but defensively violent terms.

Fear rules

Mix that with racist fears, or fear of “the other” of any kind, and it is clear that America’s phobia about being gunless is a mental disorder of a national kind. The patent neurosis of Concealed Carry is an admission that fear rules. It is a symptom of an addiction to the idea that vigilante justice is heroic, and that the national character of America is formed through violence, and that shooting another person is a solution to a problem.

It is not. Instead, the neurosis of Concealed Carry reveals the fact that gun owners are, without exception, responsible for 1) the fear of cops both within the force and 2) fear of the cops from the citizenry at large. It’s a repeating cycle of a fearfully militarized society. In other words, a patent neurosis.

Fear creates war, which is why more Americans have died from gun violence (both by force and self-inflicted) than all the American soldiers ever killed in foreign wars. That, we must admit, is a sign of a neurosis that must be cured. Because too many of us are dying while trying to figure it all out.

Perhaps if we treat the nation’s gun obsession as a collective mental illness, we’ll be better able to assess its impact on society. That way we can get to the reasons why so many people feel so afraid in a nation that is supposed to stand for freedom, but instead has created a prison of its own paranoia.