A thorough debunking of Project 2025 and dystopian Heritage Foundation objectives

I downloaded the Project 2025 “book” from The Heritage Foundation website yesterday. Soon, I’ll dig into the contents and its proposals, but the first fascinating dissection examines the tone and nature of its introduction. This document is the product of frightened white men screaming into the void of their paranoia, defined as “a mental state where a person has an irrational fear of others and a persistent belief that they are being harmed or deceived.” The definition perfectly describes The Heritage Foundation and its pet Project 2025. The language is rife with raw hyperbole, blatant hypocrisy, and outright denial of the real cause of America’s disease of conflicted ideology, which is longstanding Republican incompetence in governance and blaming the Left for the problems it engenders.

The first paragraphs reap what it intends to sow, demonstrating the paranoia behind the document’s intention:

The Left has spent millions fearmongering about Project 2025, because they’re terrified of losing their power. And they should be. Project 2025 offers a menu of solutions to the border crisis, inflation, a stagnant economy, and rampant crime. It shows how we can take on China, fix our schools, and support families. But most importantly, it dismantles the unaccountable Deep State, taking power away from Leftist elites and giving it back to the American people.

The opening tactic, as you see here, is to accuse the other side of your own level of paranoia. This is the tone of the entire Project 2025 document. I’ve gone through the opening sections to examine how this fear-driven ideology stakes its ground and employs rabid hyperbole to incite self-righteous rage among its intended audience. They quickly move to accusations against the “cultural elite” they so despise.

“The bad news today is that our political establishment and cultural elite have once again driven America toward decline. The good news is that we know the way out even though the challenges today are not what they were in the 1970s. Conservatives should be confident that we can rescue our kids, reclaim our culture, revive our economy, and defeat the anti-American Left—at home and abroad. We did it before and will do it again.”

Notice the tactic of retreating to the Reagan Era to claim success in the so-called “Culture Wars.” Conservatives love to believe that Ronald Reagan restored conservatism to its rightful place to “unite the nation,” but that’s the first lie, because it ignores the fact that Reagan historically leveraged racial fears using terms such as “welfare queens” to enrage and divide Americans along bigoted lines. This salvo echoes to this day in Trumpism’s dog-whistle racism and fear of intellectual Black people while dismissing the many sins of men like Clarence Thomas whose long record of questionable behavior and ethical breaches earn no rebukes from hypocritical conservatives eager to claim Black men among their ranks. The Republican Party and its newest manifesto eagerly seek to leverage racism, bigotry, misogyny and Christian patriarchal rule over society as the foundation of what they want to call “democracy,” if that is a concern at all.

The passage above refers to revitalization of the economy, which Democrats under Clinton, Obama, and President Joe Biden all accomplished in the wake of Republican malfeasance and economic crashes wrought by massive tax breaks for the wealthy, refusal to respect or uphold financial regulations, and letting predatory lenders run amok with interest rates on credit cards to trading toxic mortgages. The cause of the 2008 recession was manifold, with both parties bearing aspects of blame, but the list of sins weighs heavier on the GOP side, because while selling subprime mortgages to consumers was a bad idea, like most sins, it was hiding the problem that made it far worse. The go-go, white-hot belief in eternal growth during the Bush era fueled conservative hubris that was too good to be true:

  • Subprime mortgage crisis: During the housing boom, lenders expanded their definition of creditworthiness and began offering mortgages to borrowers with poor credit histories. These high-risk loans, known as subprime mortgages, were packaged and sold to investors. 
  • Deregulation: The financial industry was deregulated, allowing for speculation on derivatives backed by mortgages. 
  • Excessive risk-taking: Banks created too much money too quickly and used it to speculate on financial markets and push up house prices. 
  • Increased borrowing: Banks and investors borrowed more money. 
  • Regulation and policy errors: There were errors in regulations and policies. 

Before all that happened, we should not forget that it was the Savings & Loan crisis, as it was essentially Republican permission that first exposed the dangers of banking deregulations foisted on society by Reaganism. The Corporate Finance Institute summarizes it this way: “In conclusion, the banking and S&L crisis of the 1980s and early 1990s was caused by a combination of factors, including deregulation, interest rate risk, a volatile real estate market, risky loans, fraud, and mismanagement.”

This quick analysis of conservative deregulation efforts demonstrates how The Heritage Foundation ignores many things Reagan did wrong while claiming him as a hero for all time. Reagan Worship is at the heart of 2025ism, dependent on the emphatic denial that the despotic Grandpa people branded The Great Communicator led one of the most corrupt administrations in United States history. So the premise that going back to Reaganism would Make America Great Again is the principle falsehood behind conservatism’s sentimental views toward an eventually daft and dementia-ridden corrupt President. They’re repeating the same sin by re-elected a clearly compromised mental mess in Donald Trump after maligning Joe Biden as too old to run again. And worse, when Democrats took charge and counseled Biden to step down, the man did so in respect to his nation’s best interests. None of this can be said for Trump, whose mental deterioration is both evident and dangerous, but whose need to avoid convictions on multiple legal fronts forces him to run for his life. That’s the only reason, along with more opportunities to grift and steal from America’s wealth through personal and political channels, Trump had to again. Trump also wants to remake the world in his image. That’s how a toxic narcissist works.

And yet, the Republican Party loves to reminisce about Reagan’s own version of nation-forming, as “an unyielding Reagan told National Security Adviser Robert McFarlane, “I want you to do whatever you have to do to help these people keep body and soul together” about the Contras down south. *PBS report

Those are not the words of a man who loves freedom. They are the words of a man who fears failure because he thinks he’s the most powerful man in the world and can’t admit that people won’t do what he says. Later, in a comic parlay of desperation and determination, Reagan shipped 1500 arms to Iran for a seven-man hostage release after claiming he’d freed all those other folks as his term began. That tells us that Reagan, like today’s Heritage Foundation, sought to undermine honest democratic processes to conduct shadow government activities, all while blaming the “Deep State” for supposedly secret ventures.

If “freedom is a fragile thing,” then so is democracy when it is gutted by the willful actions of a unitary executive and crooked accomplices. Nixon led the way on that, Reagan echoed it, and eventually it was the irascibly domineering VP Dick Cheney who gave voice to it. But all along, it was Republican administrations wishing their guy was king. At the same time, it was those “kings” who led the way in terms of criminal indictments and convictions compared to Democrat presidencies.

Reagan presided over the HUD scandal under James Watt and the Iran-Contra scandal, busting unions and gutting the middle class were just some of the ways Reagan used the government he claimed to despise to dismantle financial protections for Americans and mess around on the world stage. It is also speculated that Reagan played loose with constitutional laws to free the hostages held by Iran, but solid proof never emerged. But do we doubt that there were such efforts given the later actions by Oliver North to commit acts of subterfuge?

That sort of willful denial of past transgressions, extending to the likes of Newt Gingrich and his dismissive views on marriage, leaves The Heritage Foundation able to claim all kinds of high-minded family values and patriotism without a shred of guilt over the bogus values apologetics for Reagan, the Bushes, and now Donald Trump, a serial adulterer and constitutional shredder par excellence.

Republicans went full fever dream over Bill Clinton’s Oval Office blowjobs and the Blue Dress, but so-called righteous Republican never questioned Nancy’s astrological addictions in defiance of Christian despise for such things, much less her dirty little mouth. The euphemistically named “Christian Right” also “looked the other way” when it came to Nancy Reagan’s hooky-spooky astrological beliefs and Hollywood habits.

Nor did anyone follow up on Nancy Reagan’s odd reputation as shared by political commentator Hunter S. Thompson, who said, “I had a soft spot in my heart for Ronald Reagan, if only because he was a sportswriter in his youth, and also because his wife gave the best head in Hollywood.”

She put her mouth to other clandestine uses with her seemingly innocent anti-drug “Just Say No” campaign preaching substance abstinence to white suburban kids. But the people victimized by that campaign were instead thousands of Black Americans rounded up and jailed on small drug charges. But Republicans used that legacy as an accusatory tool of Jim Crow imposition on Black Men.The for-profit jail industry that emerged to reap dough from that travesty turned out to be a favorite among conservatives eager to punish Black Americans for standing up to White Authority of any kind. Private prisons also replaced slavery as tools for cheap labor.

It all began even earlier, under Nixon. As documented in the OpenSecrets website: “Since President Richard Nixon declared the national “War on Drugs” in the 1970s, the American prison population has skyrocketed; the same is true of the numbers of people locked up in private prisons, especially since the 1990s. Of the 2016 contributions that went to candidates or parties, 85 percent went to Republicans. That’s higher than in most previous cycles, but consistent with the conservative leanings of this industry. Since 1990, private prisons have given 73 percent of their total party-and-candidate contributions to Republicans.” The criminal persecution and prejudice against of Black men and women, on top of economic losses wrought by the disadvantage of slavery, is responsible for that culture’s familial difficulties, pursuant crime and gang activity, and the still-relentless blaming of “minorities” and immigrants for America’s problems. Many Black Americans lead the nation in every human endeavor, which is proof that the prejudice aimed against them in this nation is the travesty for which the country needs to account. That’s why the claims of The Heritage Foundation drip with bloody irony when making statements such as these in Project 2025:

“Freedom is a fragile thing and it’s never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by way of inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation[.]1 “

The Heritage Foundation loves to ignore the Republican affiliation with its dirty bedfellows, such as those openly waving flags at the insurrection. These include Confederacy holdouts, neo-Nazis, the KKK, anti-Semitic groups and influencers, and backwoods militias eager to overthrow the government using AR-15s atop their bulging waistbands. The GOP loves such complicity in its stalwarts and doesn’t seem to care if they stand for everything America isn’t supposed to be.

P25 loves to ring the bell of “family values” and freedom based ostensibly on the Constitution as one bookend and Christian values on the other. But the volumes between constitute a condensed library of bigotry, discrimination, religious persecution, and self-proclaimed victimhood. There’s also irony amid transitional statements like this one:

“Restore the family as the centerpiece of American life and protect our children.”

Supposedly, conservatives don’t like the government interfering in the lives of people. That’s the opposite of conservatism. It’s unclear what or how The Heritage Foundation plans to do to impose “the family as the centerpiece of American life,” but if you look at the weird calls for corporal punishment tin schools, one wonders if Project 2025 isn’t a massive excuse for profligate child abuse. Yahoo News reports, “Oklahoma State Rep. Jim Olsen says corporal punishment in schools has been “successful” for centuries and should remain legal, even for students with disabilities.”

Pro-Life? More like Pro-Sperm.

Any organization refusing to hold men accountable for abortions caused my male imposition of sperm on women is hypocritical.

That’s right, every single abortion in America is caused by a man’s sperm.

But the so-called “Pro-Life” movement never mentions that fact. Instead, they persist in accusing women of being irresponsible by holding to what are now called “reproductive rights.” To enforce this misogynistic worldview, the Heritage Foundation identified potential Supreme Court justices willing to overturn the established law of Roe vs. Wade and throw the abortion rights issue back to the jurisdiction of states. Those justices acted deceitfully in their testimony, insinuating they respected established law on abortion, but in effect, they lied. Now the tragedies of undercutting women’s healthcare rights results in death for women facing medical emergencies.

The conservative faction of America even preaches that pregnancies wrought by rape should be “brought to term.” By those measures, women are nothing but vessels for male sperm according to The Heritage Foundation.

There is nothing “pro-family” about blaming women for problems caused by men or supported by busybody moralizing Christian women behaving like Conservative Mean Girls looking to control other women’s lives. They may “pray” to end abortion, and that’s fine. But then they vote for men willing to stick their dicks into women’s lives without remorse.

The hypocrisy of the Pro-Life defies its supposed roots in Christian values. The Bible shows Jesus dismissing those accusing a woman of adultery by stating, “Let he that is without sin cast the first stone.” With that statement, Jesus indicts not just the men seeking to kill the woman according to their laws (an idea recently raised in some US) but also indicts the authoritarian state from which the stoning tradition emanated. In other words, Jesus indicted the men who brought the women before him, not the woman accused by them.

This proves that if Jesus were alive today, he would say, “If you must depend upon the law to bring about the kingdom of God, you have already failed.”

So yes, on every issue, The Heritage Foundation fails America with its dystopian Project 2025.

(dys·to·pi·an/disˈtōpēən/ “relating to or denoting an imagined state or society where there is great suffering or injustice.) version of authoritarian rule over society.

The HF P 25 is not only dystopian, it is fascist at its core. Consider the definition fascism as it relates to what you’ve already read and learned here, and what is about to come:

Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy (Christianity), subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race (White people) and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

That last note about fascism on the Right, strong regimentation of society and the economy is ardently resisted by Republican fascists claiming instead that they advocate “free market economics.”

But since Reagan the forcible redistribution of wealth from the middle class to America’s wealthiest citizens is not a product of the “free market” at all. Reagan’s specious version of “trickle-down economics” is an economic experiment rewarding corporatism and a plutocracy aided by massive tax breaks for the uber-wealthy while workers’ wages remain flat or depressed. Efforts to raise minimum wages are called “socialism” by economic cynics, a gaslighting of the lower and middle class to subjugate their interests.

A small sector of the US population now possesses more wealth than the other 96% combined. Statistics aren’t the point. The real matter is how factions of society impacted by these policies now believe that the people who caused them are the cure to their problems! The wealthy plutocrat named Donald Trump makes all sorts of promises to Make America Great Again while bloating the national debt by 25%, promising tax cuts for the middle class that expired, and giving billions over to the rich who fund his feckless whims of tariffs, false accounting and outright lies. He’s promised to exclude corporations from environmental legislation who ante up billions to avoid being accountable. That’s environmental injustice bought and sold. The people typically victimized by environmental pollution are the poor, especially minorities.

The Heritage Foundation reflects this vow to sell off American virtues to the highest bidder by dismantling governmental protections and blaming Americans for their own problems:

“Dismantle the administrative state and return self-governance to the American people.”

There’s another counter to this P25 argument. The “administrative state” under Trump’s rule led to an attempt to overthrow the government after he lost the 2020 election. His lies about election fraud, the plot to assemble fake electors and his attempted coup through the January 6th insurrection all prove that his vision of the “administrative state” is a fascist form of government where he rules like a king without question of his authority. The Heritage Foundation knows this, but refuses to admit it. In fact, it is their entire goal to use Trump as a leveraging device, wait for him to croak from his bad habits, and put in place a theocratic state ruling over the United States of American with administrative impact forcing itself into every aspect of our lives.

But oh, yeah, there’s also the “border crisis.” Let’s talk about that.  

“Defend our nation’s sovereignty, borders, and bounty against global threats.”

Hey guys, you know who welcomed millions of immigrant into America over the last fifty years? That’s right: it was companies seeking cheap labor while privatizing the profits and socializing the losses. And the accounting of supposed “costs” to Americans in terms of taxes covering immigrant needs seem to ignore the tax contributions of those targeted by such accusations.

And yes, our schools and public facilities need support to deal with language-challenged immigrant children and adults. But that support should come from the companies employing cheaper immigrant labor, because they are privatizing the profits and exporting the costs to everyday Americans. That’s true in Big Ag. That’s true in the restaurant industry, hospitality, you name it. That’s not how the “free market” is supposed to work. If you use the product, which is immigrants, you should pay the bills for those benefits. What we’re actually seeing is socialized corporatism. The Nanny State of corporate welfare is the real problem, not benefits earned and secured by Americans through Social Security, Medicare, or Veteran’s Affairs.

But all P25 wants to talk about is God, because, you know, that sounds righteous and true.

“Secure our God-given individual rights to live freely—what our Constitution calls “the Blessings of Liberty.”

Well, now we see how hypocritical the Heritage Foundation is. They opposite aims than to secure the “Blessings of Liberty.” People already suffer the effects of Right-Wing identity politics suppressing women’s rights, Black and civil equity, human diversity, or any kind of inclusion. The Heritage Foundation advocates fascism, not freedom, and is in truth a godless organization in all its principle claims. It spits on Jesus by seeking to create a society divided along ideological terms with specific terms of discrimination.

Anyone familiar with the parable of the Good Samaritan knows better. It was self-righteous religious zealots passing by the man left for dead in the ditch because he was considered “unclean” according to religious and cultural laws imposed by legalistic authorities. Instead, the Good Samaritan, a man from a people despised by the community, who saved the man from suffering, paid for his care (that’s socialism) and even funded his needs until he was nursed back to health. If left to the devices of The Heritage Foundation, that man rots in the ditch because he’s unworthy of protection under “God’s Laws” according to biblically literal interpretations of anachronistic scriptures. The Good Samaritan, while well-off, constituted a “radical, bleeding-heart do-gooder” of the type that Jesus proclaimed as worthy of God’s grace.

All of this proves that Project 2025 is a gaslighting pack of self-righteous lies.

“In 1979, the threats we faced were the Soviet Union, the socialism of 1970s liberals, and the predatory deviancy of cultural elites. Reagan defeated these beasts by ignoring their tentacles and striking instead at their hearts.”

No, Reagan did not “defeat these beasts.” Conservatism emphatically lost the battle to control the lives of people based on identity politics, but now they’re engaging in warlike attempts at a fascist takeover of American laws.

For sure, the Moral Majority movement took hold in the United States. It’s denial of reality became the foundation of right-wing politics. Religious conservatism embraced that fight by opposing the teaching of evolution and scientific truth in public schools, seeking to replace it with the “science of denial” based on creationism and euphemistic Intelligent Design. This inane ideology of denial infects nearly 40% of the American population. That is the “majority” that supports the likes of a devilish liar like Trump while claiming he’s a “man of God” made in the image of King David while insisting, quite devilishly in its own right, that “God works with flawed people.”

Well, guess what? John the Baptist would argue with that. The “man of the wilderness” defined the religious and political authorities of his day in advance of Jesus’ arrival on the scene. John called the religious authorities a “brood of vipers” in an echo of the legalistic Serpent who deceived Adam and Eve in that holy parable of humanity’s creation. The Baptist also tossed out religious rituals and the “pay for play” model of Prosperity Gospel in force at the Temple, where money-changers turned God’s house into a commercial enterprise. John later paid the price for his honesty when King Herod, the prophetically perfect model for Donald Trump in his melding of politics and religion, had John’s head chopped off on a promise to his daughter that if she danced lasciviously for his audience the King would grant her any favor she asked. Her corrupt mother asked for the head of John the Baptist because “he publicly denounced her marriage to Herod Antipas, criticizing it as unlawful since she was previously married to Herod’s brother Philip, which went against Jewish law; this public rebuke deeply offended Herodias and fueled her desire for revenge against John.”

Oh, my Lord! What does that say about the serial adulterer and thrice-married and divorced Donald Trump? It does not sound like John the Baptist, the precessor to Jesus in Judeo-Christian heritage, would approve of the sexually abusive narcissist whose relationship with Jeffrey Epstein revealed that he “likes them young?”

Well, even so. The Baptist’s disapproval still does not make it an “American Value” or representative of the liberties promised in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The Separation Clause in the 1st Amendment proves that there shall be no state religion. But if the Project 2025 initiative DOES succeed, shouldn’t it impose John the Baptists indictment on the likes of Donald Trump? Okay! Bring it on! Let’s see it!

What about Russia and Putin?

As for threats from the Soviet Union being “defeated” by Reagan, America now lives under the thumb of Vladimir Putin’s dictates through Trump, including collusion that he denies, and documented election interference by the Russian state through American social media and even its conservative talking heads on Fox, Newsmax and many other outlets trumping talking points straight from the Pipeline of Putin. Trump is also a kompromat to Russian interests and investment in his businesses. And whether Trump likes to admit it or not, the information revealed about him in the dossier a few years back rings all too true given his corrupt and perverted behavior confessed in public and alluded in his Jeffrey Epstein affiliations.

But look at how P25 tries to avoid their support of a corrupt felon and adjudicated rapist.

“In many ways, the entire point of centralizing political power is to subvert the family. Its purpose is to replace people’s natural loves and loyalties with unnatural ones. You see this in the popular left-wing aphorism, “Government is simply the name we give to the things we choose to do together.” But in real life, most of the things people “do together” have nothing to do with government.”

Well, we know that Reagan once stated, “Government is not the solution to our problems, government is the problem.” And yet P25 plans to use the government to impose its well over all Americans. Again, the hypocrisy and gaslighting the fear and bigotry, the outright hate and delusion are all wrapped together in the paranoid fascism and accusations of the Right that the Left, whose main mission is equal rights, is somehow the cause of America’s problems.

Just look at the fascist tone of this insane statement:

“Furthermore, the next conservative President must understand that using government alone to respond to symptoms of the family crisis is a dead end. Federal power must instead be wielded to reverse the crisis and rescue America’s kids from familial breakdown. The Conservative Promise includes dozens of specific policies to accomplish this existential task.”

See how that works? When liberalism advocates for personal freedoms, it’s evil. But when conservatism threatens fascist impositions, it is liberty at work. These people are nuts. They are consumed with a paranoia so deep it infests their minds like brain worms. Perhaps that’s why RFK, Jr. is so popular a choice for an administrative post.

Here’s more P25 paranoia:

“Today the Left is threatening the tax-exempt status of churches and charities that reject woke progressivism. They will soon turn to Christian schools and clubs with the same totalitarian intent.”

This might be justified given the many churches seem to be little more than political delivery points for fascist right-wing agendas. The entire premise upon which tax-exempt status is granted is avoiding political purposes through religion. That’s based on the First Amendment Separation Clause. So, get a clue, Heritage Foundation. The only reason churches would lose tax-exempt status is by doing your bidding. You’re the cause, not the solution to religious loss of liberty.

But Oh My God, the next bit of language sounds like Civil War.

“The next conservative President must make the institutions of American civil society hard targets for woke culture warriors.”

That’s a violent threat. That’s viciousness as policy. That’s un-American, and yet Trump embraces it by stating he plans to persecute “the enemy within.” The sociopathic tone of the hate directed toward “woke culture warriors” shows zero empathy for people long victimized by the longstanding cultural contract of bigotry imposed according to by race, sexual orientation, gender, and religion. Fascism loves to ignore its hateful side and history to claim perpetual authority.

“This starts with deleting the terms sexual orientation and gender identity (“SOGI”), diversity, equity, and inclusion.”

Well, look at that. A great example of censorship to impose bigotry and thought control. That’s George Orwell’s 1984 in action. Then look at the terrified word salad that comes along next. Paranoid much?

(“DEI”), gender, gender equality, gender equity, gender awareness, gender-sensi- tive, abortion, reproductive health, reproductive rights, and any other term used to deprive Americans of their First Amendment rights out of every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.”

That’s censorship, people. The Heritage Foundation wants to “cancel culture” everything it fears. What goddamned hypocrites.

Oh, and naked pictures? Well, that has to go too.

“Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women.”

Art by Christopher Cudworth titled, “Commisseration” ®2022

We’ve been through many trials to determine the difference between art and pornography. Who else recalls the actions of the John Ashcroft covering up the metal breasts of nude statues in Washington?

We’ve learned that such prudes often have plenty to hide themselves.

As for child sexual abuse. Do you know who conducts some of the worst child predation and pedophilia in America? It’s religious institutions ranging from the Catholic Church to Protestant and Evangelical Youth Pastors. Even the Boy Scouts of America, a highly conservative organization, paid out billions to victims of youth sexual abuse for conduct documented for decades. Even former Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert got caught hiding illicit behavior and child abuse from his wrestling coach days. The bigger they are the harder that fall.

All forms of child sexual abuse are awful, but The Heritage Foundation ignores the facts of its real sources to aim hatred at others, especially targets like Drag Queens, while ignoring its closest friends sticking their hands down the pants of boys and girls alike.

What P25 really fears is how many of its own folks can’t resist some good fapping. Even Speaker Mike Johnson enlisted his son as an anti-porn agent, which suggests it was a big problem for both of them. That’s pretty typical out there in the world of suppressed sexual urges. Many of the world’s worst offenders become anti-this-or-that oppressors until they’re ultimate exposed as liars about their own natures. And yes, porn is addictive. So if that’s a problem for you, take personal responsibility, get some treatment, and deal with it like one should for any addiction. Here’s a quick little fun game. When you read the next P25 excerpt in bold, replace the word “pornography” with “football,” and the language is pretty revealing and a bit amusing. Add in gambling and the whole package of the NFL, which behaves like a pornography invading every possible day of the week while claiming family values and military patriotism, feels obscene.

“Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime. Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered.”

Man, Oh Man. That’s some Orwellian language right there.

But let’s move on to education, a favorite target of Right Wing despotism and fear.

This writer is a substitute teacher with five years of experience working in public schools from Pre-K through high school. I’ve earned high praise as a teacher for encouraging kids with a wide range of capabilities to learn the best way they can. I’ve also learned skills in classroom management and teaching correct behavior. But the P25 wants to blame public schools for somehow undermining parental authority. Let me clue you in on something. That’s about as far from the real problem as you can get. If anything, it is self-righteous conservative parents bitching about their kid’s grades and telling teachers how to do their job that is the problem. =P25 loves bitching about education because they hate it as a path to critical thinking, which is what public schools and colleges are supposed to do; help us learn to think for ourselves. Any parent that doesn’t agree with that is a control freak, and potentially abusive in their indoctrination habits, oppressive insecurity, and inadequate feelings of self-importance. There, we’ve said it. Schools have a balancing role in society. The idea that parents are perfect and own all rights to their child’s mind is a product of a deeply flawed tribal narrative.  

“In our schools, the question of parental authority over their children’s education is a simple one: Schools serve parents, not the other way around. That is, of course, the best argument for universal school choice—a goal all conservatives and conservative Presidents must pursue.

P25 won’t admit it, but ‘school choice’ is a euphemism for ‘we don’t want our kids to learn science or history that conflicts with our conservative beliefs.’

Just look at what comes next in the P25 Manifesto. This is what this entire document is about. It is equivalent to a Unabomber Level incendiary call to gut American society and replace it with a paranoid religious conservative dystopian version of reality. Look at what they fear most:

“The noxious tenets of “critical race theory” and “gender ideology” should be excised from curricula in every public school in the country. These theories poison our children, who are being taught on the one hand to affirm that the color of their skin fundamentally determines their identity and even their moral status while on the other they are taught to deny the very creatureliness that inheres in being human and consists in accepting the givenness of our nature as men or women.”

No, you specious bigots. The United States has a racist and bigoted history of discrimination that needs to be taught to be understood. Those who don’t learn from history are condemned to repeat it. If the Heritage Foundation lived up to its name, it would abide in that premise. Instead, its denials are a dishonest attempt to avoid conservatism’s deep role in the ugly aspects of our nation’s history. You’d rather lie to yourselves than admit that truth! The Heritage Foundation avoids our nation’s heritagebecause we are not a perfect country. Germany had the guts to apologize for the Holocaust. Gutless conservatives want to proclaim United States’ innocence in the face of all its transgressions. That is the sign of a deeply dishonest mindset.

The same thing goes for conservative, legalistic Christianity, a belief system long used to foment and support the ugliest forms of indoctrination and domination, especially of indigenous peoples. That bwing of religion focused on absolutism is evil in using its twisted version of God and Christ to marginalize people through biblical literalism and its supposed infallible authority.

“Of course, the surest way to put the federal government back to work for the American people is to reduce its size and scope back to something resembling the original constitutional intent. Conservatives desire a smaller government not for its own sake, but for the sake of human flourishing. But the Washington Establishment doesn’t want a constitutionally limited government because it means they lose power and are held more accountable by the people who put them in power.”

The eternal whine about government size is the originalist complaint that the “Founders” never intended for government to grow. That’s idiotic. As for being “accountable by the people who put them in power,” what was that event on January 6th about again? Was that a “constitutionally limited government” at work for the people? Or was that the product of a conservatively supported lying fascist trying to gut the government for selfish purposes. We know the difference. The Heritage Foundation is the organization that aggressively denies our nation’s laws.

“In the case of making the federal government smaller, more effective, and accountable, the simple answer is the Constitution itself. The surest proof of this is how strenuously and creatively generations of progressives and many Republican insiders have worked to cut themselves free from the strictures of the 1789 Constitution and subsequent amendments.”

This is utter nonsense. The worst offense when it comes to superseding the 1789 Constitution and its amendments is the conservative gutting of the Second Amendment by splicing it in half to give unrestricted gun rights to any Tom, Dick and Harry who wants to carry military-grade weapons around and conduct mass shootings of children in schools, people in churches, concertgoer and 4th of July parade crowds. The Second Amendment call for a “well-regulated militia” is the originalist value that should be restored.

“Consider the federal budget. Under current law, Congress is required to pass a budget—and 12 issue-specific spending bills comporting with it—every single year. The last time Congress did so was in 1996. Congress no longer meaningfully budgets, authorizes, or categorizes spending.”

Hey boys. Back when Clinton was President, he worked collaboratively with Republicans to balance the budget. Cross-party collaboration is how this is supposed to work. But the Tea Party radicalized the process and now MAGA extremists want to punish Americans for playing by the rules and make their own set of rules.  

“The term Administrative State refers to the policymaking work done by the bureaucracies of all the federal government’s departments, agencies, and millions of employees. Under Article I of the Constitution, “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.” That is, federal law is enacted only by elected legislators in both houses of Congress.”

How ironic. The conservative Supreme Court has, for the last decade, been making laws and imposing legislation right and left. So shut the hell up about Congress, P25. You’re way off base about this one.  

“This exclusive authority was part of the Framers’ doctrine of “separated powers.” They not only split the federal government’s legislative, executive, and judicial powers into different branches. They also gave each branch checks over the others. Under our Constitution, the legislative branch—Congress—is far and away the most powerful and, correspondingly, the most accountable to the people.”

Here’s a real winner of a statement. The Republican-led House is the least effective legislative body in the history of the nation, and the Republican-led Senate refused to affirm the impeachment of Trump for the insurrection. Stop the apologetics for an incompetent political travesty on the Right.   

“Unaccountable federal spending is the secret lifeblood of the Great Awokening. Nearly every power center held by the Left is funded or supported, one way or another, through the bureaucracy by Congress.”

Again, the US military once had an audit done and the accountants assigned to that task gave up. No one can tell where the money’s spent, what goes where, or what military-industrial contractors are benefitting the most.  

“Let’s be clear: The most egregious regulations promulgated by the current Administration come from one place: the Oval Office. The President cannot hide.”

And you see no irony in this statement when considering that Trump lied to the American people repeatedly about the threat of Covid? And that he golfed far more than he governed, and cheated at that? And his workdays started at 11:00 am to allow time to paint his face and execute his combover. And when presented with information it had to be summarized on one page so that his short attention span could handle it? And can he even read?

We’ve seen it all by now, and the President can hide. A ton. And Trump attempted coercion of Ukraine, and tried to hide it with obstruction of justice, to gain political dirt on his opponent Joe Biden. And, Trump engaged in election lies that led to an insurrection, and tried to hide that. He also hid Classified documents in his personal residence, and tried to hide that too. He tried to hide his scandalous relationship with a series of high-profile porn stars, including $130,000 payoffs as hush money, a case that is concluding as this piece is written. He also “hid” from the public a sexual assault years ago on a woman whom he defamed and now has to pay millions of dollars because he lied about it.

With all these clear indications of your pet president hiding the truth, what are you people at The Heritage Foundation doing beside kissing each other’s rings?  Oh wait. We’re about to see. You’re going to project all these faults on others. That’s the way you do it. You get your money for nothing and your chicks for free?

“A conservative President must move swiftly to do away with these vast abuses of presidential power and remove the career and political bureaucrats who fuel it.”

We’ve heard how you think this is supposed to work, but the incoming President is currently beholden to technology billionaires and Russian President Vladimir Putin, who dictates American foreign policy to a “conservative President” too damned weak yet patently narcissistic in his public shows of “strength” to stand up to authoritarians and wealthy figures he admires.

“As monolithic as the Left’s institutional power appears to be, it originates with appropriations from Congress and is made complete by a feckless President. A conservative President must look to the legislative branch for decisive action.”

Hey, Heritage biggies, what are you really talking about here? President Joe Biden stabilized the economy after Trump crashed it just like Obama did after Bush crashed it. And Reagan didn’t do anything good for the economy either! His buddie GHWB promise “no new taxes” but whoopsie doops! Many times now, Democrat Presidents saved America from economic devastation with steady hands and wise policy. There’s nothing monolithic about good governance. But Republicans don’t recognize it, so they blame others for the problems caused by conflicted ideology and religious denial.  

“Finally, the President can restore public confidence and accountability to our most important government function of all: national defense. The American people desire a military full of highly skilled servicemen and women who can protect the homeland and our interests overseas. The next conservative President must end the Left’s social experimentation with the military, restore warfighting as its sole mission, and set defeating the threat of the Chinese Communist Party as its highest priority.”

Does this statment mean The Heritage Foundation wants to start wars? Because that’s what Bush did after letting America’s guard down, allowing terrorist attacks in New York and DC, (including our Pentagon, for God’s Sake) and going to war on false premises and lies, conducting torture in the same cells used by Saddam Hussein, and generally messing around to the tune of $7T of unbudgeted war spending with no result but death and injury, mental suffering and PTSD for thousands of servicemen and women of all diversity spectrum willing to serve but deemed “suckers and losers” by the likes of Donald Trump, a draft-dodger.

“The next conservative President must possess the courage to relentlessly put the interests of the everyday American over the desires of the ruling elite. Their outrage cannot be prevented; it must simply be ignored. And it can be. The Left derives its power from the institutions they control. But those institutions are only powerful to the extent that constitutional officers surrender their own legitimate authority to them.”

Here’s a question for all your die-hard conservatives out there: What is “The Left?”

It’s people who believe trust that an understanding of the humanities, science, critical thinking and cultural equity are good things. Those are American values held closely by the Founding Fathers. So we have to surmise that it’s conservatism that undermines democracy when it chooses bigotry over equality, and fascism over democratic rule of law.

“To most Americans, this is common sense. But in Washington, D.C. and other centers of Leftist power like the media and the academy, this statement of basic civics is branded hate speech. Progressive elites speak in lofty terms of openness, progress, expertise, cooperation, and globalization. But too often, these terms are just rhetorical Trojan horses concealing their true intention—stripping “we the people” of our constitutional authority over our country’s future.

Perhaps it’s Time for a reality check, folks. Common sense does not mean acting like the world was created in six literal days, or that a global flood once covered the whole earth. We need to start with baseline concepts of reality if we’re going to discuss common sense.

And, when you talk about “openness, progress, expertise, cooperation, and globalization,” those are all aspects of the American experiment that promoted growth and international respect.  

“Instead, they believe in a kind of 21st century Wilsonian order in which the “enlightened,” highly educated managerial elite runs things rather than the humble, patriotic working families who make up the majority of what the elites contemptuously call “fly-over country.”

That’s quite a hard-on The Heritage Foundation has for the name “Wilson.”

Are they talking about that volleyball in the movie Castaway? Because that Wilson guy seemed like a good friend in a time of need, and America needs one of those right now. But also, no one on the Left calls middle America “fly-over country.” We live her. That’s a term invented by the Right to claim self-victimhood. Oh my gosh, they’re still bent over Wilson. Look at this.

“This Wilsonian hubris has spread like a cancer through many of America’s largest corporations, its public institutions, and its popular culture. Those who run our so-called American corporations have bent to the will of the woke agenda and care more for their foreign investors and organizations than their American workers and customers.”

There is no “woke agenda.” There is a commitment among respectful people to honor the personal autonomy of all people. We understand you’re either too stubborn or willfully ignorant to grasp that, but we know why. You’re profoundly afraid of people different than you––including young people, because THF is primarily angry old white men and batty bigoted control freaks––who want to punish people for being themselves rather than cowing to some whitewashed version of a Republican tombstone.

And take note, if you’re supposedlly “pro-life,” because when it comes to “cancer,” let’s recall who got rid of the vicious threat of “pre-existing conditions” as a determinant for who in American can get healthcare coverage and who can’t. The ironically “Darwinian” call by conservatives to exclude those with health problems from the healthcare system is a product of abjectly dismissive corporatism, not a liberal agenda. The real “death squads” acting on Americans are healthcare insurers denying claims and letting people die to collect more profits. If you couldn’t figure that out, that’s why the United Healthcare guy got shot. Got a clue yet?

Here goes P25 xenophobia next:

“Progressive policymakers and pundits in America either fail to understand this premise or intentionally reject it. They enthusiastically support supranational organizations like the United Nations and European Union, which are run and staffed almost entirely by people who share their values and are mostly insulated from the influence of national elections. That’s why they are eager for America to sign international treaties on everything from pharmaceutical patents to climate change to “the rights of the child”—and why those treaties invariably endorse poli- cies that could never pass through the U.S. Congress.”

Okay, you’re xenophobic. We get it. But collaborating with the world’s other nations on healthcare, for example, could help us prevent future pandemics. Obama planned for that and Trump gutted our agencies tasked with that purpose, then denied the threat of Covid and blamed everyone else for his lies and incompetence. He’s a vicious liar, that one. Selfish. Fearful. Narcissistic. Dismissive. A grifter willing to sell $100 Bibles made in China while screaming about Chinese influence on America.

“That’s why today’s progressive Left so cavalierly supports open borders despite the lawless humanitarian crisis their policy created along America’s southern border. They seek to purge the very concept of the nation-state from the American ethos, no matter how much crime increases or resources drop for schools and hospitals or wages decrease for the working class. Open-borders activism is a classic example of what the German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer called “cheap grace”—publicly promoting one’s own virtue without risking any personal incon- venience. Indeed, the only direct impact of open borders on pro-open borders elites is that the constant flow of illegal immigration suppresses the wages of their housekeepers, landscapers, and busboys.”

Illegal immigration went down during Obama’s presidency. Get a clue.

And you don’t get to cite Dietrich Bonhoeffer about “cheap grace.” This is a complete misuse of that term, and an ignorant one at that. Bonhoeffer stood up to the specific forms of fascism the Heritage Foundation and P25 are now proposing. He gave his life defending genuine Christian principles and proposed that Christianity should give up its religiosity and embrace the “this worldliness” of its Judaistic heritage. He did this because religious legalism in league with political fascism led to The Holocaust, in which Hitler stated, “We’re only doing to the Jews what Christianity has been doing for 1500 years.” So you fake Christians at the Heritage Foundation do not get to use Bonhoeffer as an example of your virtues. You are the precise opposite of everything he stood for.

But now, let’s look at your other abuse of Bonhoeffer’s words…

“Cheap grace” aptly describes the Left’s love affair with environmental extremism. Those who suffer most from the policies environmentalism would have us enact are the aged, poor, and vulnerable. It is not a political cause, but a pseudo-religion meant to baptize liberals’ ruthless pursuit of absolute power in the holy water of environmental virtue.”

On this subject you are absolutely wrong. The term “Environmental justice” describes how the poor and those of racial origins other than white peope are most often victims of pollution caused by industry and bad public policy. There is nothing ‘extremist’ about holding corporations responsible for these abuses accountable. But you flip it around casually to support your absolutely dishonest notions about “cheap grace.” You should be ashamed. Or do you have no shame, just a lousy grasp of theology and an addiction to stealing words from heroes to make yourself look heroic? You’re frauds. Just like Trump.

“At its very heart, environmental extremism is decidedly anti-human. Stewardship and conservation are supplanted by population control and economic regression. Environmental ideologues would ban the fuels that run almost all of the world’s cars, planes, factories, farms, and electricity grids. Abandoning confidence in human resilience and creativity in responding to the challenges of the future would raise impediments to the most meaningful human activities. They would stand human affairs on their head, regarding human activity itself as fundamentally a threat to be sacrificed to the god of nature.?”

Oh, so it’s still all about oil and gas, is it? And we know you think climate change “isn’t real.” That’s one more layer of terminal denial employed as an ideology of selfish profit-making and dismissal of accountability.

“The same goals are the heart of elite support for economic globalization. For 30 years, America’s political, economic, and cultural leaders embraced and enriched Communist China and its genocidal Communist Party while hollowing out America’s industrial base. What may have started out with good intentions has now been made clear. Unfettered trade with China has been a catastrophe. It has made a handful of American corporations enormously profitable while twisting their business incentives away from the American people’s needs.”

It’s frustrating to read statements like this when it was America’s corporations shipping jobs overseas in search of cheap labor while America’s unions were gutted first by Reagan and decades of corporatist dissolution. How Republicans try to claim the high road on this issue? Could you be any more specious about cause and effect? Yes, you can. So let’s see it.  

“For a generation, politicians of both parties promised that engagement with Beijing would grow our economy while injecting American values into China. The opposite has happened. American factories have closed. Jobs have been outsourced. Our manufacturing economy has been financialized. And all along, the corporations profiting failed to export our values of human rights and freedom; rather, they imported China’s anti-American values into their C-suites.”

What the heck does this mean… “Our manufacturing economy has been financialized.” Talk about Orwellian speak. Who taught you English? Do you just make things up to sound smart? Because you’re not sounding smart making statements like this that mean nothing.

But by the way, when it comes to American industry’s interests, President Joe Biden just blocked the sale of US Steel to Nippon in Japan. Democrats have stood by workers and manufacturers for decades, and Biden’s infrastructure investment is forward-looking and futuristic. Trump promised to bring back American jobs and did nothing.

“When the Founders spoke of “pursuit of Happiness,” what they meant might be understood today as in essence “pursuit of Blessedness.” That is, an individual must be free to live as his Creator ordained—to flourish. Our Constitution grants each of us the liberty to do not what we want, but what we ought. This pursuit of the good life is found primarily in family—marriage, children, Thanksgiving dinners, and the like. Many find happiness through their work. Think of dedicated teach- ers or health care professionals you know, entrepreneurs or plumbers throwing themselves into their businesses—anyone who sees a job well done as a personal reward. Religious devotion and spirituality are the greatest sources of happiness.”

This religious language is steeped in dog-whistle bigotry. If an individual must be free to live as his Creator ordained, then leave people alone. Stop legislating religious morals based on anachronistic values long debunked by biblical scholars willing to confront the age-old tradition leading to persecution of Jews, gay people, Black people, women and more. You’re hypocrites on every front.  

“The American Republic was founded on principles prioritizing and maximizing individuals’ rights to live their best life or to enjoy what the Framers called “the Blessings of Liberty.” It’s this radical equality—liberty for all—not just of rights but of authority—that the rich and powerful have hated about democracy in America since 1776. They resent Americans’ audacity in insisting that we don’t need them to tell us how to live. It’s this inalienable right of self-direction—of each person’s opportunity to direct himself or herself, and his or her community, to the good— that the ruling class disdains.”

You don’t even hear yourselves speak, do you? Everything you cite here is exactly what liberalism advocates. But because you disapprove of gay people, or don’t want to hold men accountable for causing abortions, or think that teaching real American history with all its abuses and genocide, racism, slavery, and Confederate treason is going to ruin young minds, you’d rather lie that it’s bigoted people who are beset by government and “the Libs.” That’s just perverse logic.

“Left to our own devices, the American people rejected European monarchy and colonialism just as we rejected slavery, second-class citizenship for women, mercantilism, socialism, Wilsonian globalism, Fascism, Communism, and (today) wokeism. To the Left, these assertions of patriotic self-assurance are just so many signs of our moral depravity and intellectual inferiority—proof that, in fact, we need a ruling elite making decisions for us.”

Americans were not “left to our own devices.” People in that era arrived through principles of Enlightenment, not religion, at a belief that America should be self-governing, not subject to a king’s rule. But conservatives of the day wanted to stick with Britain! You’ve been on the wrong side of history from the beginning, and now you’re gutting our constitution with a “Promise” of a ruling elite based on theocracy, fascist instincts and denial of the Constitution as proven by Donald Trump’s attempt to overthrow the government. Donald Trump is not a president for all people. He’s stated that emphatically.

“The promise of socialism—Communism, Marxism, progressivism, Fascism, whatever name it chooses—is simple: Government control of the economy can ensure equal outcomes for all people. The problem is that it has never done so. There is no such thing as “the government.” There are just people who work for the government and wield its power and who—at almost every opportunity—wield it to serve themselves first and everyone else a distant second. This is not a failing of one nation or socialist party, but inherent in human nature.”

There you go again, throwing words around to sound smart? It’s hilarious that you claim that there’s no such thing as “the government.” You’ve already spent thousands of word outlining what the government should be and needs to be, and haven’t even gotten to the part where you map out the dogmatic tactics you plan to employe. Interestingly, on review, the entire document created as Project 2025 amounts to a denial of its own existence because every contention is a dystopian dream that you’re somehow persecuted when the entire “plan” is to in turn… persecute, disenfranchise, punish, and depict “the other” as “the enemy within.” You’re clearly a paranoid pack of fools with an 8th grade grasp of civics, immature, and decidedly antagonistic.   

“Analogous pro-growth reforms for America’s voluntary civil society are also in order. America is not an economy; it is a country. Economic freedom is not the only important freedom. Freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and the freedom to assemble also represent key components of the American promise. Today, in addition to the problem of Big Tech censorship, we see speakers at universities shouted down, parents investigated and arrested for attempting to speak at school board meetings, and donors to conservative causes harassed and intimidated. The next conservative President must defend our First Amendment rights. “

When people are called to account for bigotry, lying about science, repeating disinformation as truth, claiming “alternative facts” (as Trump did) and generally trolling members of society as having “Trump Derangement Syndrome” to gaslight people into submission, they are not the persecutors you claim. They’re standing up for the freedoms you say you defend yet abuse. The Fox News Network paid $750 in defamation lawsuits to a election machine tech company it publicly maligned. And Trump earned fines of $450M for illegal business practices. These are the abuses evidencing real corruption. And those people shouted down at school board meetings? Free speech works both ways.

“Ultimately, the Left does not believe that all men are created equal—they think they are special. They certainly don’t think all people have an unalienable right to pursue the good life. They think only they themselves have such a right along with a moral responsibility to make decisions for everyone else. They don’t think any citizen, state, business, church, or charity should be allowed any freedom until they first bend the knee.”

Um, let’s review the evidence here when it comes to “all men are created equal.” First, it is religious beliefs that deem folks the “chosen people” of God. America’s history includes the ugly effects of Manifest Destiny used to commit genocide and hold slaves, both of which defied equality for all “men.” It was conservatives denying women the right to vote, and it’s conservatives to this day denying gay people the right to marriage, all based on “special status” of the Christian religion as a dictator of values for America. That’s unconstitutional.

“Conservatives have just two years and one shot to get this right. With enemies at home and abroad, there is no margin for error. Time is running short. If we fail, the fight for the very idea of America may be lost.”

Look at the fear and desperation and the acknowledged brevity of the entire P25 premise, which is this: impose thy will on others quickly before they see the lies upon which it is based. That’s why Trumpism and MAGA works. They are shallow, slogan-based claims to authority based on fear, willful ignorance, self-proclaimed victimhood and dystopian paranoia.  The Right Wing media leverages these fears for profits.
 

I think you included the following quote in the P25 doc, but it might have popped up somewhere else too. It’s appropriate describing what’s going on in America, but not in favor of P25.

Just two years after the death of the last surviving Constitutional Convention delegate, James Madison, Abraham Lincoln warned that the greatest threat to America would come not from without, but from within.

Christian Nationalism is Christianity’s enemy

The history of Christianity is one of argument over the meaning of Jesus, the role of sin in life, and humanity’s relationship to God. Or at least, that’s what Christianity is supposed to be about. Instead, the world has witnessed a protracted conflict over scripture, its authorship and verity, and how we’re supposed to understand critical aspects of the book Christianity calls the Holy Bible.

To understand these questions more clearly, consider that when Jesus arrived on the scene two thousand years ago, he followed in the wake of a man called John the Baptist, of whom there was a supposed prophecy. Isaiah 40:3: “The voice of one crying in the wilderness: ” Prepare the way of the LORD; Make straight in the desert. A highway for our God.” John’s role was clear: cut through the religious legalism of the day and place the focus on repentance of sin. He challenged the rules and rituals of the temple authorities, and Jesus later dismissed them as meaningless to a relationship with God.

We all know what happened from there. The religious authorities took great offense at being questioned. They sent people out to quiz Jesus on the rules they made from scripture, and Jesus tossed revealing questions back at them. They could not answer him effectively because their hypocrisy in implementing those traditions was apparent: they loved the authority it conferred upon them. Jesus also found the use of the temple for commercial purposes offensive. He attacked those conventions by creating a whip out of cords and drove the vendors out of his “father’s house.”

None of this took place because the religious authorities were Jewish. Jesus was a Jew by birth and faith. But he despised what conservative religious authorities had done to turn Judaism into a religion of law rather than love of others. He used parables to instruct people on the ways of God that stood outside the Torah as examples of the right way to live. Most of these stories drew from daily life experiences, and many used organic symbolism: the mustard seed, the yeast in the dough, to draw connections between nature and spiritual truths. That’s a vital example of how we’re supposed to read the Bible. Yet centuries of adherence to biblical literalism and the legalism that emerges from it have buried Jesus’ wisdom and ways under layers of bad theology, defined as defending God when God does not need defending.  

Rather than learn from the conflicted nature of the religious authorities in Jesus’ day, the religion known as Christianity repeated its mistakes many times in history. The Catholic Church used purgatory as a money-making scheme based on a Jewish reference to the purification of souls. One of their priests, Martin Luther, challenged this brand of legalism and sought to emphasize salvation through grace.

That led to the Reformation, a religious movement that produced Protestantism, a branch of Christianity that, to this day, many conservative Catholics consider illegitimate. But Protestants went on to invent their form of legalism, which goes by various names, including fundamentalism, biblical literalism, and today’s populist form called “apologetics.”

All of these constitute the most legalistic forms of Christianity. Many focus on “obeying the rules” and engaging in the confessional language of latter-day Christianity. These habits frequently dismiss Jesus’s core teachings in favor of adhering to a set statement of belief encompassed in creeds or, worse, through alliance with political aims of power and authority.

That brings us to the problems facing America today, where politically charged religious beliefs assemble a form of allegiance to God and Country. This approach is collectively known as Christian Nationalism, fueled by the brand of Christianity called Dominionism, a repeat of the same legalistic fascism that religious authorities engaged in two thousand years ago.

When you trace the behavior patterns to their religious sources, it’s easy to comprehend. The Serpent in the Garden of Eden sought to take Adam and Even under its authority and control by quoting God and pretending to defend God’s Word. “Did God say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the trees in the garden,” and then issues the legalistic half-truth that leads the couple into sin, “You will not surely die.”

See, the Serpent “was more clever than any of the wild animals the LORD God had made.” It knew how to manipulate people to take them under its authority. It tempted them with promises of knowledge and authority, stating, “God knows that when you eat fruit from that tree, you will know things you have never known before.”

Where do we find that type of temptation repeated in scripture? Satan tempts Jesus in the Wilderness by inviting him to use power and create bread to assuage his hunger or to submit to Satan’s authority and earn all control over the world. See, the temptations of legalism have always been with us. It’s sad that Christianity so often succumbs to its own worst flaws and then tries to impose them on the world. That’s what we’re facing in the United States of America: a religious mindset that assumes it owns all authority but ignores the corruption at its core. That belief system is easily exploited by those who excel at manipulation and seek power for themselves, historically, theologically, and politically. Jesus didn’t like or abide by any of that.

I’m the author of the book Honest-To-Goodness: Why Christianity Needs A Reality Check and How To Make It Happen. You’ll find solutions to the problems caused by legalistic Christianity, and ways to confront its many forms in social media, politics, and otherwise.

What GOP stands for these days

I looked up the history of the acronym GOP as a shorthand for the Republican Party. The Wikipedia page on the Republican Party says this:

“The term “Grand Old Party” is a traditional nickname for the Republican Party and the abbreviation “GOP” is a commonly used designation. The term originated in 1875 in the Congressional Record, referring to the party associated with the successful military defense of the Union as “this gallant old party”.

I’d always thought it stood for Grand Old Party, which is just as lame. But these days, the Republican Party is anything but Grand or Gallant. So the old terminology is moot. I propose that we give the GOP a new set of more accurate terms to replace its traditional claims to grandness or gallantry.

GOP and dying wishes

The option I propose, given the Republican Party’s tactics over the last fifteen years or so, is a far more accurate description of how the GOP operates. We’ll get to that in a moment.

But first, we need to understand the nature of the most recent hypocrisy. That is the installation of a third Supreme Court justice by decree of Donald Trump. We all recall how Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell self-righteously claimed that no President up for election within the year should be granted the right to nominate a Supreme Court judge. So McConnell blocked Merrick Garland’s nomination, only to invite Trump’s last-minute nomination of a constitutional originalist to replace the recently deceased Ruth Bader Ginsburg, whose dying wish was that her replacement would not be named until after the election.

The GOP has for decades been whining about so-called “activist judges” on the Supreme Court. Their concerns have focused on the idea that supposedly “liberal” justices are legislating “from the bench” by voting in favor of civil rights, economic parity, corporate responsibility and environmental justice in America rather than dragging the nation back to an interpretation of the United States Constitution before slavery was outlawed, women had the right to vote and America was a population of just 2.5M people. But here’s a fact that matters: The country is 130 times larger today according to the United States Census Bureau. We have fifty states, not just a few. We are a diverse nation thanks to immigration over dozens of decades and a couple centuries. The Constitution as it was originally written was never sufficient to cover all that change. The Founders knew that, which is why the power to commend Amendments to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were implemented. To ignore that wisdom is to kick the Founder right in their constitutional nuts.

Yet that’s what some in the GOP love to do.

Changing America

The idea that America is the “same place” as it was 243 years ago is an example of the controlling, abusive notion that all the Amendments and beneficial changes in law and policy installed since that time are meaningless affectations adopted by a whimsically feckless population of liberals.

Ironically, this country would not even have the Second Amendment if things had stayed fixed in place as Constitutional originalists would have it. On that subject, perhaps they’re correct that amendments can be used for ill-suited purposes. After all, America does not seem capable of managing “A well-regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state…” Now we’re being gaslighted by vigilante militias and the GOP, both who claim to represent an originalist interpretation of the Second Amendment that ignores that opening phrase in favor of the latter, “…the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

That is the gaslighting tactic (a lie by selective judgment) upon which activist interpretations of the Second Amendment now depend. As a result, Americans are literally being gaslighted to death by rampant gun violence in the streets, doctrinally motivated mass shooters armed to the teeth, and self-professed militia members playing soldier while claiming self-defense.

Why do all these people deep-down claim to want to arm themselves? Many claim that their armory is to prevent the government from having too much power. Here’s a sobering fact: more Americans have died from gun violence on American soil than all the soldiers killed in wars on foreign soils.

That means we are being gaslighted by the idea that guns are the path to safety in America. The people who make that claim (through the NRA, and other bodies) form one of the GOP’s pet voting blocs. Some equate even the idea of personal freedom with gun rights.

Yes, our country had to fight for its freedom to gain liberty from the rule of England. Guns are useful tools in war. That’s what they were invented for. That’s why a well-regulated militia truly is necessary for the security of a free state.

But it is principles, not guns, that form the true foundations of freedom.

Liberalism and democracy

It was liberalism and the determination that America should be independent from the rule of a king that established the country in the first place. There is also the issue that the nation’s Founders recognized the danger of establishing or enforcing a state religion, so the Separation Clause was written specifically to avoid the rule of one religion over the country.

These days the Christian evangelical community persists in claiming that the United States of America is a “Christian nation,” founded on “Christian principles” and therefore subject to the directives of theocratic directives from whatever source they might be issued. This is another form of gaslighting, a way to “manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity.”

Crazy times

These are crazy times we live in. To perpetually insist that something is true that is not true, especially by accusing those most affected by that untruth of being wrong, is psychological abuse. So is being a bully over every issue that confronts you. That is what the President of the United States does every single day of the year.

That is also the central tactic of the GOP these days. Choose any principle; be it racism, feminism, gay rights, environmental protection, even the rights of an individual in comparison to a corporation, and the GOP finds a way to flip those concerns around as a means to gaslight people into submission. Crazy times indeed.

Racism and the GOP

When it comes to racism, the GOP inherited the originally vicious views of Southern Democrats and turned into a voting bloc first exploited in dog-whistle fashion by the grandfatherly visage of President Ronald Reagan. The Southern Strategy persists through the era of President Donald Trump, whose open appeal to racists to gain votes for his re-election includes patronage and Retweets bragging that there are “good people” on both sides of the debate over civil rights in America. He doesn’t bother to explain what kinds of “good people” want to persecute blacks and send American citizens “back to Africa” or whatever racist taunt they choose to exhort, but Trump doesn’t care about such details. He is happy to gaslight principled citizens into questioning their own good judgment by wondering what the President means by describing angry white citizens as “good people.”

Blacks and police brutality

The scourge of police brutality toward black people in America is so longstanding and frequent that movements such as Black Lives Matter emerged to heighten awareness of the problem. But conservatives gaslighted the issue by pumping out alternative slogans such as Blue Lives Matter and All Lives Matter. Rather than address and acknowledge that 200+ years of racial suppression continues in this nation, the opponents of full civil rights for people of color selfishly claim persecution for themselves.This is gaslighting at its worst.

The GOP encourages this attitude of denial with its support of Trump and the specious slogan Make America Great Again. Those words are a dog-whistle act of gaslighting unto themselves. They insinuate that the advances in civil rights, environmental protection and religious equanimity established by the Constitution are illegitimate.

Constitutional originalism is gaslighting

Now the Senate has installed yet another constitutional originalist in the Supreme Court. This is an outright act of the sort of judicial activism against which the GOP has railed for decades. It is gaslighting in its most extreme political form.

That is what the GOP stands for these days: Gaslighting Over Principle.

We’re stuck with it for the time being, but there will come a moment in history when the tables turn again. That may come sooner or later. But gaslighting does win the day on November 3, the country as we’ve known it for 243 years will cease to exist, and we’ll all be subject to the violent instincts and abusive advances of a highly conflicted man and his dysfunctionally self-absorbed family.

That’s the choice we’re making on November the third. We can let ourselves be gaslighted into insanity, or we can stand against the GOP and its lying tactics, sycophantic whorishness and cloying lust for power, black eyes and all.

The confused role model Kim Davis deserves her own Unreality Show

Kim-Davis-1024x576When it comes to cognitive dissonance, it does not matter whether one is Republican, Democrat or Libertarian. Catholic, Protestant or Muslim. Baseball, Football or Soccer Fan. If you can’t connect the realities of cause and effect, you are clearly operating in the realm of unreality.

And, if you’re delusional at a deep enough level, and actually turn out to be either rich or poor enough to serve as a caricature of society and social status, you might even qualify to get your own Reality Show.

Trumped Up

Just ask the likes of Donald Trump, the rich dingbat now running for America’s highest office. His trademark bad hair and catchphrases such as “You’re Fired!” perfectly fit the carnival atmosphere of reality television. The fact that he is now the front-runner among alg-donald-trump-jpgRepublican candidates illustrates the cognitive dissonance of Americans that cannot separate reality from unreality.
Their keen sense of aggressive ignorance mirrors the unreal reality of one Honey Boo Boo, the child princess with a family that perfectly expressed the worst that America has to offer in the way of values.

Yet somehow the pure absence of conscience in that show symbolizes the brand of depravity that serves as values in the post-modern age. Honey Boo Boo is a direct descendant of the circus carnivals that once toured America with bearded ladies and Strongmen, freaks of nature who somehow appeal to that sense of inhumanity and prurience from which you can’t look away, and will pay to see.

The cause of our curiosity is the effect it has on us. Desperate for both entertainment and confirmation that we’re somehow better than the people we subject to our attentions, we turn people ill-prepared for the role into heroes into rock stars. And that includes the rock stars themselves.

Confused role models

Into this cognitive disconnect between reality and unreality marches one Kim Davis. She makes the claim that her religious beliefs are being violated by carrying out her legally specified duties of issuing marriage licenses to gay couples.

Kim-Davis-Kentucky-ClerkWe’ll leave her own confused life out of our analysis other than to say that she has not been a model of marital virtue. Not by any current measure, or past. To her credit she has apparently asked forgiveness for her mistakes, and deserves an audience with God or Christ to reconcile her need for justification. That’s between her and her maker.

Yet she’s weirdly fashioned herself into something of a role model for a certain brand of Christian who feels persecuted by a society that legitimately questions hypocrites who won’t do the job they are paid to do because it appears to conflict with their religious beliefs.

Well, social media has had a fine time with that contention, hasn’t it? There are all kinds of religious beliefs out there just waiting to be violated. A pastor that is a fan of guns could argue that the ban his church places on carrying concealed weapons is against his personal beliefs. The breaches of such nature are never-ending.

Which is why our Constitution guarantees both freedom of religion and freedom from religion. The whole point of our Constitution is to establish and preside over the general consensus between moral values and public laws. It is a confused role model that refuses to understand these qualities that govern our country.

Where she’s wrong

Kim Davis may be all right in her own mind, but she’s got it all wrong when it comes to working in the public sector. By making the claim that she should not be “forced” ––if kim-davisthat’s how she feels about it––to issue gay marriage licenses is an apparent confession that she does not believe in her oath and role as a public servant. Period.

And the Bible is all too clear about that, over and over again:

1 Peter 2:13 Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every human authority: whether to the emperor, as the supreme authority…

And so on. Now you could argue that Jesus was pretty good at breaking that rule. But that’s Jesus. He had a broader goal in mind than pissing off the authorities. He came to enlighten people that the greatest law of all was love, and that love is the great revealer of the human spirit.

So Kim Davis isn’t even aligned with Jesus Christ in her attempt at castigating gays for wanting to share their love in marriage.

She’s wrong in the public sector and she’s wrong in the halls of the Lord.

Interpretations

This is the problem with so-called “modern” Christianity with its so-called evangelical roots. A faith that tries to proselytize without first checking the accuracy of its contentions, and then further push the agenda through politics, winds up way off base.

kim-davis-flagBecause those contentions are all a matter of interpretation. There is no consensus among Christians on the subject of gay marriage. So what’s she’s trying to do is use her ostensible authority as a representative of her faith is to superimpose those beliefs even above those who do not agree with her theology. She is, in other words, a very loose cannon who is confused on so many fronts she can only appeal to public sympathy for elucidation and support.

And manically, we must suppose, she has used her seemingly populist popularity to claim she wants to run for Governor of Kentucky. And at what point would her religious beliefs then conflict with her pursuant oath of office?

She clearly hasn’t thought any of this through. Nor would she likely care to try. People of conviction without investigation often turn a blind eye to the facts staring them plain in the face.

But that is exactly what makes a great reality show star. The illusion of wonder is far greater than the mundane work of actually wondering what to believe.

Which should make her the next star of an Unreality Show. And you heard it here first.

The most frightening fact of the world may be how fake it is

0826-shooter-video-2Like anyone with a social media news feed, I clicked through to find out what the shooting of the Virginia news reporter was all about. And upon first viewing of the video with the gunman extending his arm with gun in hand, my thoughts turned inside out.

“This is fake,” I thought to myself.

And then the video showed shots being fired. And there was no blood, even at close range. Nothing. The manner in which the reporter ran away did not even look real. One has to believe that a heavy pistol like that makes an impact on the body when bullets are fired. Especially multiple bullets. Yet she ran away like nothing was happening. Screams of apparent fear yes, but pain? It just did not sound like that.

And from what anyone could tell, the cameraman did not even make a sound. Nor the woman being interviewed. After the initial scream, we don’t hear a word from her. Not a “Don’t shoot me!” or anything.

So the entire enterprise feels like a fake.

And why so fake?

Virtual realities

There are a ton of agendas potentially linked to this “story” emanating from a seemingly peaceful scene. But that was suspect too. The aerial photos showed the cameraman slumped on the wooden deck, again with no blood around him, in a place isolated from all other public interference. There was no blood to be seen anywhere on the decking at the “murder scene.”

clip-shootingFrankly, it all had the look of a video game.

There have been other shootings in American history that were fake in other ways, but with real consequences. The assassination of President John F. Kennedy comes to mind. The story the American people were fed was obviously fake. Millions of words have since been spilled about that incident, and one conclusion has not been reached. But there is considerable consensus that there was more than one shooter, perhaps as many as four. In other words, it was a conspiracy to kill.

So there are conspiracies to fake a killing, and conspiracies to cover up actual killings. And why should that be?

Who killed JFK?

Let’s consider the Kennedy assassination first. There were plenty of people with motives, who hated Kennedy and all that he stood for. The Mob didn’t like him. That’s a bad start for a peaceful ending. The CIA didn’t like him, and didn’t differ that much from the Mob in many respects. Kennedy was planning to eradicate the CIA and go after the Mob. But take notice that forms of both the Mob and the CIA still survive while Kennedy and his brother are long dead.

There was Lyndon Johnson, who by many counts was a pretty evil character and a political assassin at the very least. Tons of people around the career of LBJ were shot and killed, including his own sister. Yet he lived to become President even though Kennedy was shot. JFK did not like or trust LBJ. The feeling was mutual.

John_F_KennedySo the Kennedy tale holds all sorts of conspiracies withing in. And before she passed away, even Jackie Kennedy whispered some things about what she thought happened, yet the family records remain sealed away.

Perhaps there are people who think America can’t really handle the truth. Some would hate to think that the government or the people associated with it (the two can be very different) are capable of such murderous intents.

It’s the government

Yet there are plenty of people who hate and distrust the government as an entire worldview. Some fantasize the government is going to impose martial law and come take their guns away. That’s a favorite meme of the radical fringe, is it not? There are militias formed in all corners of the country, practicing just in case the troops come to take over the land.

Then there are people who think that it’s the gun nuts who are the real danger, and that guns are the real problem in America.

Convergence of craziness

These stories all converge in one place when a shooting occurs like the apparent murder of a news reporter in Virginia. It was all bundled together with headlines about an angry black man shooting a pretty white reporter. These conveniently serve as a potential conflagration to the race war going on in the United States and also an indictment of the gun violence afflicting black culture and society as a whole.

Should we now mention that America has a black president and an election coming up in 2016? Truly, from the moment Obama was elected there has been thinly disguised racist opposition to his position in life. And is there now a coincidence to the idea that a fair-skinned black man assailed a pretty white reporter, and that the response from family and friends all feels like very bad acting? It all feels calculated to enrage the radical fringe in some way or another.

In fact there’s a whole meme surrounding “false flag” events. It can seem like craziness. But it’s all about confusing agendas on purpose.

Confusing agendas

There are some who conspire to suggest that stories such as the Virginia news reporter slaying are designed to do two things; raise ire against black citizens and simultaneously push for more gun control. It all gets confusing pretty fast, to the point where it can be difficult to tell the real news from the fake.

Then we have CNN and FOX and MSNBC all chiming in with their angles and spins, and pretty soon the temptation is to just turn off the “news” and see what the hell happens next. Yet the nearly fake incidents just seem to keep coming, all smacking of psychological operations staged by someone to accomplish some agenda, or confuse that of their opposition.

Point blank

If the recent shooting was real, there are still some patently suspicious elements to it construction. The gunman’s cell phone footage and the seeming lack of awareness by the cameraman and the two people doing the interview is incredulous. That scene in which the shooter holds out the pistol with his cell phone perfectly composed behind it feels completely bogus yet calculated to create fear. He stands there forever, pointing and muttering the word “bitch.” Frankly it feels like a badly made B movie scene. If this were stocked on the shelves of the former Blockbuster video rental chain, it would have been on a back shelf for sure.

Scope and scale 

Admit it, the events of the last 15 years alone have stretched your credulity on every front. But because so much of our reality comes to us through video screens, at the same scope and scale, it is hard to discern what feels real or not.

The unreal scope and scale of events on 9/11 floored the American populace and the silence of the skies for days afterward felt weird and unreal. We were fed the story about Al Qaeda hijackers, and heard the tale of “Let’s roll” chronicling heroes on board the plane that ditched into the Pennsylvania field. Again, it all felt constructed to rally Americans in a war against the unknown enemy, especially Muslims.

For effect, even the Pentagon itself was struck, and no military planes were sent out to intercept a jetliner from striking the main building of our national security. Is our country really that inept? Does our mighty military suck so badly we can’t even protect our own Pentagon?

The more the “facts” rolled in, the more they seemed staged to create an effect. But of course America then rolled off to war in Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with the events of 9/11, and the news media cheerleaded all the way.

Skeptics

FlagWaiverExcept there were some of us who sat back and wondered what was really happening with 9/11. We might be the same group of people who don’t buy the line we were given on the Kennedy assassination. Either way, it adds up to a worldview that is really chilling. The most frightening fact about the world may be how fake it really is.

Think about Nazi Germany. From inside that country people had little idea there were millions of Jews being massacred within their nation’s borders. The signs of such murderous intents were all there, with Hitler’s Mein Kampf with its anti-this and anti-that rhetoric. The man had major compensatory issues going on, and perhaps an evil dose of self-denial at some level. Some call him the anti-Christ. Well, if so, the anti-Christ is dead.

At least we think so. Where’s the body?

World orders

Hitler was no stupid form of crazy. He knew how to manipulate people, or at least hire people to do it for him. From such conspiratorial desires to rule the world emanate powerful and savage attempts to control people and eradicate others.

If one man was capable of such fury in history, why not others? Why not believe there are people just as willing to “sacrifice” a few lives in order to corner the market on political power? After all, while Hitler was ravaging Europe, Stalin was no bargain either. Nor Mussolini. All were fascists of a sort, and throw Japan into the mix at the time as well. Hitler was not alone in history with his conspiratorial rage against others. There were plenty of Roman Emperors that were just as powerfully devious and evil as evil can be. We do ourselves a disservice by even branding Hitler the worst of all villains. It diminishes our ability to conceive the nature of the evil still in operation to this day.

Every major country has its own ugly history of imperialism and international manipulation to account for. America prided itself on rescuing the Jews in World War II, yet our own nation’s history includes a massive genocide on Native Americans. Such is the fakery of American Exceptionalism. We also embraced slavery for a time. So it’s no surprise that we act like savages in the greater world as well.

Tortured souls

Look at our behavior after we took over the nation of Iraq. We tortured people in the very same jails used by Saddam Hussein to torture his perceived enemies. We did it indiscriminately as well, with soldiers mocking those they tortured, stacking bodies like abu2cord wood and forcing sexual humiliation upon them. The excuse our government gave at the time was that our torturous ways were the result of a few “bad apples” who got going and could not be stopped.

But we know better, don’t we? With a surly man like Dick Cheney in charge with his “anything goes” approach to governance, we know that they knew back in Washington what was going on. When the photos emerged and it was obvious they were not fakes, the best the boys in DC could do was to claim that the release of those photos was a threat to our national security and the safety of troops overseas. Talk about your ultimate cynical response.

Money talks

There’s just one major problem with that storyline. While we were torturing Iraqis, we were also in the process of privatizing much of the war in Iraq. That meant Dick Cheney’s real issue with the threat to America’s interests was more focused on the outcome of his 141208_fallon_cheneylies_apinvestments with Halliburton, the private mercenary company with which Cheney was long associated. Halliburton made more than $39B on the war in Iraq. Cheney was simply trying to take care of his friends. And his money.

So the war crimes we committed were essentially privatized as well. The war we were fighting in Iraq was a fake from the beginning, constructed from the whole cloth of a pre-existing doctrine for control and manipulation of the Middle East for oil, and more.

Yes, the “fake” war had real consequences, and many people including American soldiers gave their lives to that war. Thousands more were maimed and damaged by the war. Our Congress was fed hurried lies and exaggerations on which to make the decision to support the war, but people with an agenda and without conscience do that without guilt. And for what?

War machines

So that people could make money off the war, which was simply an extension or exploitation of the events on 9/11. The entire enterprise, and that is a word that describes it well, was the ultimate illustration of how fake reasons drive the way the world operates the way it does.

King Romney appears angry with his subjects

It’s all a very old construct in a new set of Emperor’s clothes. Machiavellian intrigue has never abated in this world. The New York Times characterized that fact with this description of Machiavelli’s book “The Prince”… is a manual for those who wish to win and keep power. The Renaissance was awash in such how-to guides, but Machiavelli’s was different. To be sure, he counsels a prince on how to act toward his enemies, using force and fraud in war.”

It goes on to describe how these arts operate: Yet Machiavelli teaches that in a world where so many are not good, you must learn to be able to not be good. The virtues taught in our secular and religious schools are incompatible with the virtues one must practice to safeguard those same institutions. The power of the lion and the cleverness of the fox: These are the qualities a leader must harness to preserve the republic.

And so we see that there are many willing “to be able to not be good.” They pride themselves on employing both the power of the lion and the cleverness of the fox. One thinks of Oliver North orchestrating the sale of arms to Iran to generate money for Contras in Nicaragua. It was a scandal, and yet Oliver North is a star on Fox TV and wanders around the United States giving lectures (including at churches) as if he were a hero for breaching America’s values with his own set of corrupt ideals. These were Machiavellian actions if there ever were such a thing. It was his intent to bend the will of the people to succumb to false truths, even at the expense of the lives of others.

And if such corruption at an international scale can carried out and then admired, why is it unimaginable that similar forces could not conceive and execute the events on 9/11? It is not unimaginable. Nor is it unimaginable that someone could fake a live murder of a news reporter to push gun control, or promote racism, or both at the same time?

At some point it’s not mere conspiracy theory to consider such possibilities, it’s common sense. Evil is one tricky bastard to identify and reveal. It takes courage and conviction in the face of corrupted power to do so.

Power brokers and breakers

Some people will simply do anything to achieve and maintain power. If there’s money to be gained in the process, all the better.

DeerCrowrevSo we must be aware that not everything we see in this world is what it appears to be. There are people who spend all day and all night planning psychological operations to frighten or convince you the world is what they want you to see. It happens from all sides of the political spectrum because that is how all wars of perception proceed. Sometimes people even create chaos against the very thing they would seem to value most, just to paint their enemies in an awful light.

It is also a weapon of misinformation to turn perceptions on the strengths of others into perceived weaknesses. That’s what happened to John Kerry with the Swiftboating treatment he received relative to his service in the military. The goal is to turn the hero into a scarecrow, then knock them down.

Apparent cause

Hence we even find an economic crash caused by the world’s largest financial institutions, only to find none of its perpetrators going to jail or suffer any consequence at all for their actions. In fact all the major financial institutions that caused the crash of 2008 got money thrown at them because they were, to borrow a phrase, “too big to fail.” Talk about your unilateral political euphemism!

The policies favored by President Bush contributed to the recession, and then Bush passed a bill to turn around and bail them out. Then Obama turned his head away from prosecution. Cause and effect? Or just cause and cause?

Cause they can. Cause they will. Cause they do. Cause it makes them even richer. Someone’s laughing all the way to the bank, that’s for sure.

Fake battles with real consequences

On the social front, society is constantly pitted against itself according to categories of race, region and culture. The forces behind all this rancor capitalize on the distraction of the conspiratorial entertainment these hot button issues provide.

jesus-blackOften, when left to their own devices, people of all colors eventually get along fine. Does it matter in the end if Jesus was black or white or Jewish or any color? It doesn’t, yet for centuries the church faked the appearance of Jesus as a principally white man, often with blonde or brown hair because that fit the image of those whom the church favored.

And so, we are seldom if ever left to our own devices. As a result, the American Civil War is still being fought as a clash of races and class. Or the lack of it.

Don’t you see? It’s no coincidence that Lincoln was assassinated after the war was won. Pretty much every time the forces of good seem to have won, including John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., or even Ronald Reagan, for God’s sake––the seemingly good people get shot or killed. But is it really just crazy people doing the shooting? Or are we simply led to believe that is the case?

You’d have to be crazy to believe that

How convenient it is to just write it all off as madness. Then the gun lobby gets to claim that it is only crazy people who kill. Never mind the idea that it may be guns themselves that make people have crazy thoughts, and give them the ability to act on them. That’s just crazy talk, right?

590868Granted, people with mental illness owning guns is never a good idea. But the gun lobby refuses to recognize even one gram of complicity in the fact that guns empower everyday, otherwise normal people to have crazy thoughts of power, vengeance and control.

It’s a fact: Guns were designed for killing. What do you think people are going to imagine when they take one in their hands? Target practice. Right.

It’s “just a sport.” Right. But if that’s the case, what is a target? The idea that guns exist just for sport or self-defense is a perverse fantasy. That’s like saying rocket ships are just for joy-riding.

Our culture simply does not reflect that reality. Guns are used all the time in movies and on television programs to kill, and kill righteously. They are presented as a solution to problems that cannot be solved by diplomacy or discussion. They make people into heroes and make heroes into legends. Guns are depicted as an extension of the soul, as if firing a weapon were part of a creed or brotherhood. And indeed, that is how the gun culture behaves.

A religion of guns

Guns have become a religion in America, and we all know that religions are all too happy to kill in order to protect their authority and the social order that sustains them. The National Rifle Association is the church. The NRA is its people.

The gun culture has a creed, and that is the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which reads, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

FIREARMBut the religion of the gun culture in America chooses to ignore the first part of the creed in order to focus on the second half of the statement.  That is, the gun culture hates the part that begins “A well regulated militia…” so that it can lobby for the more selfish aspect of “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

There is thus an entirely relativistic conclusion to which so many Americans have now come. They pretend the first part of the Second Amendment does not exist in order to abide by the powerful, yet still relativistic nature of the ‘right of the people to keep and bear arms.’ This is rather like insisting that Jesus is more important than God, and that God has to take a background seat.

That would be a fake religion indeed. And thus we have a fake devotion in America to the real nature of the Second Amendment, which says that guns shall be well regulated.

Infringed

And what about this word, “infringed?” Does that mean no laws at all pertaining to guns, and that people can own what they want, and use them at will?

Well the word “infringe” is defined as follows: actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.)

But the term infringed by itself does not define the nature of the law. It only corresponds to the terms laid out by the government as such laws pertain to guns. Which means, if the government determines that “well regulated” means stricter gun laws, then the second half of the Second Amendment and the right of the people to bear arms is not infringed. Case closed.

You can hear the gun nuts screaming from the rafters of Congress right now. Their reality is however constructed manifestly around an unreality. They’re fakers, in other words, manipulating our Constitution to their own selfish desires.

Top down control

john-boehner-gaveljpg-6706b1f02a6d1dabBut it’s not just gun nuts who push for false interpretations of our Constitution. Crazy thoughts emanate from the top down as well. In fact that’s where so many of them start, because where there’s profit and control to be had, people do crazy things and teach crazy ideologies to get other people to fall in line with their thinking.

In fact that’s how people come to ignore the very real separation of church and state demanded by the Constitution (freedom from religion is guaranteed just like freedom of religion) and call America a Christian nation.

But let’s examine that claim.

We have a right to be suspicious of a Christian following that takes the original goodness of “love your neighbor and help the poor” and turns it into money-making machines for the many false prophets and televangelists who manipulate, cajole and steal (even) from the poor to enrich themselves. Then these wealthy “Christians” invest in politicians that promulgate their power-based ideology, often overriding the personal liberaties of othters in the process. It amounts to a state religion or theocracy at that point, which is the exact opposite to why the national was formed in the first place.

So when these same groups turn around and become political, even to the point of calling America a Christian nation, it is time to call them out as fake on many levels. The non-profit and tax-free status granted churches demands as much, or else they should lose their tax-free status. That is based on clarity of purpose. A church that is faking it as a non-profit, or acting as political entity must be called to account.

Fakes and bakes

gettyimages-461656522-e1436299461791There are so many fakes in the world it can be difficult to tell at all what is real. And if you spend your entire day sorting through the insanity of all that we’re fed, and social media has made it even worse, you can go crazy just trying to figure it out.

The only thing you can do is be on guard and not take the next “news” item at face value. And be careful what you hear a politician say, because they are in the business of manipulating your emotions to gain your vote. Do not accept that everything your government on the right or the left is going to be true, or real, or honest. Because it’s not. Fakery is baked into the manner in which people communicate. It’s like flour in the cake. Or maybe it’s the sugar. It’s hard to tell sometimes.

From the dawn of time

6-SerpentPeople apparently can’t afford not to lie. None of us. From the moment in the Bible when Adam blamed Eve for making him eat of the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge, there have been men willing to shift blame and try to get off easy for the crimes they have committed or are about to commit.

And whether you believe the Garden of Eden was a literal place or more likely a symbol of innocence, it is gone forever. God made sure of that, and warned that life was going to be difficult, dangerous, deceptive and tough for the human race. Let us not forget that God literally branded us a bunch of fakers and liars. That’s called Original Sin.

But of course some people think God is a fake as well, and with some good reason. It’s pretty hard to reconcile the harsh events from early scripture with all its genocides and warlike character to that of Jesus Christ, whose anger was more righteous and targeted toward a specific group such as the Pharisees. But Jesus was never genocidal like the God of the so-called Old Testament. Jesus never murdered anyone, but was depicted doing miracles of healing instead. Jesus and God feel like two different entities. Who knows what the other member of the Holy Trinity wants? For a religion supposedly based on One God, it seems like Christianity is faking it too. Let’s not even discuss worship of the Virgin Mary. Did she have to fake an orgasm when Jesus was ostensibly conceived by the Holy Spirit?

Critical thinking

All this miraculous stuff begot some skepticism from intelligent people. Even Thomas Jefferson could not bring himself to believe in the miraculous nature of Jesus. He obviously considered all those miracles a bit of fakery. Jefferson went through the Bible cutting out the parts he considered too fake to abide. Yet he did admire the personal philosophy of Jesus and respected the apparent (eventual?) goodness of God. So it is not some flaw of character to apply a bit of skepticism or doubt to all that we encounter in this world.

A culture of euphemism

1images-Walt_Palmer_433576075Certainly even the news is subject to fakery, and even seemingly “real” events can be staged to deceive, or else events quickly get blown out of proportion as well. It’s all in the packaging.

But people don’t seem to care! Why else would people willingly become a fan of ‘professional wrestling’ which is all a deception, an act, and a fake? Even our so-called “reality shows” are staged to encapsulate and leverage drama for entertainment.

Reality comes home to roost

Now we actually have a reality show star in Donald Trump running for the office of President. We’ve already had an actor like Ronald Reagan take the world stage. Honestly, no one can tell the difference between the statements these men make for effect from those in which they truly believe.

NewsYes, the most frightening fact of the world may be how fake it is. And as a result, we’ve evolved a culture of euphemism, in which it is considered an acceptable method of communication to make false statements simply because they feel like they could be true. All it takes to escape consequence is to parse the statement with a disclaimer, “That’s not what I really meant to say” or “You took my words out of context.”

The worst fakers don’t even pretend to care about the truth. They all such inquiries “gotcha” questions simply because they are never prepared to answer in honest fashion.

And when that doesn’t work, they conspire to create their own realities even to the point of faking events and taking lives. Because if that’s what it takes to win, they’re going to do it. If it gets captured on live TV for the world to see, all the better.

Because fake reality is often even better than the real thing when it comes to winning a war.

When religious freedom becomes a farce

Farce: a comic dramatic work using buffoonery and horseplay and typically including crude characterization and ludicrously improbable situations.

FlagWaiverA friend pulled me aside to ask what the hell was going on in Indiana with the bill that apparently opens the door for people to discriminate based on religious beliefs.

Only here’s the challenge my friend wanted to know: Why can’t private businesses choose who they serve or don’t serve? Isn’t it their right in a free market to make that choice?

That shows the confusion most people face over the questions about Indiana Bill 101 (no pun intended) and why it is a farce of dangerous proportions.

The issue of discrimination on basis of religious freedom comes down to a basic Constitutional statement contained in the Establishment Clause, which is described this way by the website Revolutionary War and Beyond.

The Establishment Clause states that Congress shall make no law “respecting an establishment of religion.” This clause is generally interpreted to mean three things. 1) That the Congress may not establish an official religion or denomination and require people to support it or believe in it. 2) The Congress may not favor in its laws one religion or denomination over another, and 3) Congress may not favor or disfavor believers or unbelievers in any religion or denomination over any other.

And there you have it. According to our nation’s Constitution, the Indiana law does not promote religious freedom as it claims to do. Instead, it imposes one religion’s belief on the citizenry as a whole. And that, my friends, is unconstitutional.

The argument that being “forced to serve gays” is an impingement on religious belief is a farce. Here’s why. Interpretation of the bible is, by definition, a highly selective process. There is no “law” that holds true even from one Christian to the next. There may be creeds and general agreement on the statutes of faith, but even in practice from city to city and town to town, or within a specific synod. the practice of religious faith is both highly varied and highly inconsistent.

And that’s perfectly fine because that is the absolute definition of religious freedom. That’s what’s protected by the United States Constitution.

Yet the Constitution also protects people from having to practice any sort of faith at all. There is no qualifying pledge of religious faith to be a United States citizen. Even the farcical phrase “under God” was jammed into the Pledge of Allegiance late in the game by a bunch of conservative politicians fearful of communist incursion in the minds of youth.

And that’s a farce as well. Which is why the Pledge of Allegiance is kind of a joke these days. Sorry to tell you that folks. It never meant that much in the first place. Kids have always recited the Pledge without any real knowledge or conviction about what it meant. It just makes some adults feel good to hear kids barking about patriotism.

The Pledge of Allegiance is a relatively harmless farce compared to the State of Indiana taking up the banner of religious freedom and turning it into a discriminatory manifesto against a segment of the population that frankly can’t be readily identified by appearance or any other measure. So the law is just mean-spirited by nature. It is an ugliness of attitude that deserves to be shouted down because it is the product of political buffoons who govern by fear and hatred rather than consideration and honesty.

There is no justification for any business to discriminate against customers for any reason. Otherwise, as my friend who raised the question ultimately concluded, “there would be chaos.”

Think about it. If you or anyone you know has to constantly question whether they are accepted by a given business either as a customer, as a potential employee or a vendor, that’s not a “free market” at all. There’s another term for that type of business. It’s called the Good Old Boy network. It leads to cronyism and monopoly. It also leads to corruption as every transaction essentially becomes a secret between those doing the exchange.

Is that the kind of nation our Founders sought to establish? Far from it. Of course our Constitution was not perfect from the start. As a nation we’ve had to emphasize aspects relative to personal freedom. This is especially true relative to matters of equality and discrimination. It’s been only 50 years since Jim Crow laws discriminating against blacks were eradicated. Yet we are still a long ways from equality in many categories of life.

So we’re facing a test with this farcical case in Indiana. We can let buffoons run our country or we can stand up against those who hide because chickenshit claims of religious freedom that amount to discrimination. Because guess what? Your religion is not the law of the land. That’s what radical Muslims want to impose with sharia law.

There’s no difference between what Indiana did and what radical Muslims are trying to do in countries around the world. None at all. Any religion advocating discrimination over equal rights is reduced by its own intolerance to a doctrine of hate. That’s not religious freedom. That’s religious intolerance.

Real Christians ought to know the difference. Jesus was welcoming of all people to the faith. According to the Bible, he spoke nothing at all about homosexuality. Not a word. Most references to homosexuality in the Bible were more about control of appetites rather than loving relationships.

And the Bible certainly said nothing about keeping gay people from buying or selling goods.

It proves that Indiana Bill 101 is a complete and total farce. It was drafted as an act of aggression by fearful, ignorant people in positions of power. Jesus called people like that to account all the time. He branded the Pharisees a “brood of vipers” and “hypocrites” for placing law over love in faith.

Those lessons still apply today.